This is just my personal opinion and I am open to learning more from others.

I think the Supreme Court says Presidents have immunity for their presidential actions while serving as president.

If presidents did not have immunity, the next administration would likely lock the previous president up over and over, back and forth. It would destroy our Republic.

What I would like to see happen is that this case is strung out past the 2024 election, so there is no funny business with Trump and the courts before the election. Then the SCOTUS finds presidents do NOT have immunity, and then Clinton, Bush, and Obama all get their rightful hearings in Guantanamo.

But that is my vindictive self speaking. I think giving presidents presidential immunity while serving as president is the right thing to do. This all works fine if we have free and fair Elections. The people make good decisions on who should be the leader when elections are free and fair.

Because we do not have free and fair elections, and we have Selections instead, we have had dangerously compromised people serve as president and this has been destroying our Republic as well.

We need to start with free and fair elections, then clean out DC, and then we can get on our way.

p.s. I think Clinton, Bush, and Obama have all committed crimes outside of their roles as President so they can likely still get arrested and locked up. Just my opinion.

u/#arrest u/#jail

What if Trump is the sacrificial lamb to get the rest of these former presidents no immunity?

“I gladly take these slings and arrows for you” ~ DJT