Reminds me of the past days where I trusted in the establishment so deeply that I would go out of my way to come up with reasons for myself to explain anything really weird, but later realised these are the "glitches in the matrix". The right glitch will wake you up.
A 900K typo is pretty easy to understand.
Without looking at the details, say you meant type 117349
But instead you type 1173490
Hitting both 9 and 0 instead of 9.
that could into a huge error, I'm this case it's 1,056,141
This is not an official count. Counts will get confirmed in a few days.
California has paper ballots
Reminds me of the past days where I trusted in the establishment so deeply that I would go out of my way to come up with reasons for myself to explain anything really weird, but later realised these are the "glitches in the matrix". The right glitch will wake you up.
You can call this "trusting the establishment" which is a way of framing the argument as something else.
But if you know how elections work, this doesn't make much sense as "a steal."
I mean Steve Garvey was one of the winners today. I don't see a benefit
Edit
I guess my point is yes you can easily make a typo that adds an extra digit I do it all time on my phone.
There's no benefit to it and if this was the plan it's super risky and fruitless.
You can easily double check this. Because the ballots exist. And you could check hot many votes came in during that period.
Please show us the 900,000 point instantaneous jump in Garvey's vote count prior to them removing them.
Look at Garveys votes now.
Look at Haley's votes.
Look at Trump's votes
Garvey has 1,342,948 according to
https://elections2024.thehill.com/primaries/california/
That just about matches Trump's 1.1 million plus Haley's 250,000.
Other wise, Garvey would have 2.2 million votes if you gave him another 900,000. Where would they have come from?