Reminds me of the past days where I trusted in the establishment so deeply that I would go out of my way to come up with reasons for myself to explain anything really weird, but later realised these are the "glitches in the matrix". The right glitch will wake you up.
If Garvey were to beat him in the primary by a million votes, there's no way they can justify Adam Schiff winning in November. They had to make the primary close now to make a Schiff win in November feasible.
This is such a dishonest rebuttal. "You're just asleep and brainwashed".
It seems like a lot of people just conclude that everything is bullshit with no evidence.
2020 was evidently stolen. The research was done on that. Same with COVID. People have spent hundreds of hours looking into the discrepancies on these.
Not so with this case, however. At least not yet. And so it seems to me to be wholly inappropriate to act like we have the same level of knowledge on this being stolen as 2020, and to then conclude that anyone who doesn't just "see" how obvious it is must be brainwashed and still asleep.
When I say I was being kind with my comment, its not an understatement.
He assumes that someone actually types out the numbers constantly instead of using a script in this day and age
Second, he further assumes that whoever is typing this is actually typing all the numbers from scratch each time, instead of just entering the updates
Third, he assumes that we were born yesterday and we did not see the exact same shenanigans in 2020 and now the repetition of the same playbook.
And further he thinks we have forgotten that these kind of "innocent mistakes" predominantly affects the right negatively
He demonstrates that his position is precarious by qualifying with "Without looking at the details" and "This is not an official count"
And by saying "This is not the official count" he pushes the idea that errors in unofficial counts have no impact on the collective psyche of the people watching them.
Every single one of these actually screams "Shill" and yet, here I was gently pointing out we are falling into the matrix trap, in the hopes that he is not a shill and it was a honestly misguided attempt at "being unbiased".
And now you jump in full steam ahead, knowing full well all these factors calling it a "dishonest rebuttal". Anyone who has been through 2020 and does not recognise the exact same playbook IS asleep and brainwashed.
The research was done on that.
Do you know why people did research on that? Because they ignored the media that dismissed every single glitch we saw as an honest mistake and tried to make us look like the crazies. AND YET, tough patriots ignored it, dug in and analysed it, and stringed together sequence of glitches - each crazy sounding on its own - together, to paint a full picture.
And you have the audacity to come here and push the same crap ?
Am reminded of the many hours spent watching those nine cameras watching Arizona's Maricopa County gold standard forensic audits and recounts sponsored by the AZ Senate. As blind as they are, these old eyes have witnessed a lot.
u/#pepedetective
Yeah, and with one simple dismissive comment, the original commenter just disrespected everyone who did that and many other things like that. We pored through the election data feeds, I even wrote scripts to crunch those numbers, and other Anons watched other cameras and did thousands of public record lookups to confirm all kinds of reports that were coming in.
You did good man, I suspected that person was a shill as much I wanted to think it was someone uninformed but when you think about it. It's rather unlikely in a situation like this.
Reminds me of the past days where I trusted in the establishment so deeply that I would go out of my way to come up with reasons for myself to explain anything really weird, but later realised these are the "glitches in the matrix". The right glitch will wake you up.
You can call this "trusting the establishment" which is a way of framing the argument as something else.
But if you know how elections work, this doesn't make much sense as "a steal."
I mean Steve Garvey was one of the winners today. I don't see a benefit
Edit
I guess my point is yes you can easily make a typo that adds an extra digit I do it all time on my phone.
There's no benefit to it and if this was the plan it's super risky and fruitless.
You can easily double check this. Because the ballots exist. And you could check hot many votes came in during that period.
Here is a more detailed breakdown of your comment: https://greatawakening.win/p/17si0UgDpR/x/c/4ZA06MaQAOA
Please show us the 900,000 point instantaneous jump in Garvey's vote count prior to them removing them.
Look at Garveys votes now.
Look at Haley's votes.
Look at Trump's votes
Garvey has 1,342,948 according to
https://elections2024.thehill.com/primaries/california/
That just about matches Trump's 1.1 million plus Haley's 250,000.
Other wise, Garvey would have 2.2 million votes if you gave him another 900,000. Where would they have come from?
The benefit if Garvey beat Schiff by a million votes? It means Schiff would be voted out of office in November.
That's a whole separate election, so pulling this stunt did not gain you anything.
My question is what would be the benefit to the people who pulled the stunt off? Nothing. Garvey is going to be on the ballot anyway.
If Garvey were to beat him in the primary by a million votes, there's no way they can justify Adam Schiff winning in November. They had to make the primary close now to make a Schiff win in November feasible.
This is such a dishonest rebuttal. "You're just asleep and brainwashed".
It seems like a lot of people just conclude that everything is bullshit with no evidence.
2020 was evidently stolen. The research was done on that. Same with COVID. People have spent hundreds of hours looking into the discrepancies on these.
Not so with this case, however. At least not yet. And so it seems to me to be wholly inappropriate to act like we have the same level of knowledge on this being stolen as 2020, and to then conclude that anyone who doesn't just "see" how obvious it is must be brainwashed and still asleep.
When I say I was being kind with my comment, its not an understatement.
He assumes that someone actually types out the numbers constantly instead of using a script in this day and age
Second, he further assumes that whoever is typing this is actually typing all the numbers from scratch each time, instead of just entering the updates
Third, he assumes that we were born yesterday and we did not see the exact same shenanigans in 2020 and now the repetition of the same playbook.
And further he thinks we have forgotten that these kind of "innocent mistakes" predominantly affects the right negatively
He demonstrates that his position is precarious by qualifying with "Without looking at the details" and "This is not an official count"
And by saying "This is not the official count" he pushes the idea that errors in unofficial counts have no impact on the collective psyche of the people watching them.
Every single one of these actually screams "Shill" and yet, here I was gently pointing out we are falling into the matrix trap, in the hopes that he is not a shill and it was a honestly misguided attempt at "being unbiased".
And now you jump in full steam ahead, knowing full well all these factors calling it a "dishonest rebuttal". Anyone who has been through 2020 and does not recognise the exact same playbook IS asleep and brainwashed.
Do you know why people did research on that? Because they ignored the media that dismissed every single glitch we saw as an honest mistake and tried to make us look like the crazies. AND YET, tough patriots ignored it, dug in and analysed it, and stringed together sequence of glitches - each crazy sounding on its own - together, to paint a full picture.
And you have the audacity to come here and push the same crap ?
Am reminded of the many hours spent watching those nine cameras watching Arizona's Maricopa County gold standard forensic audits and recounts sponsored by the AZ Senate. As blind as they are, these old eyes have witnessed a lot. u/#pepedetective
Yeah, and with one simple dismissive comment, the original commenter just disrespected everyone who did that and many other things like that. We pored through the election data feeds, I even wrote scripts to crunch those numbers, and other Anons watched other cameras and did thousands of public record lookups to confirm all kinds of reports that were coming in.
You did good man, I suspected that person was a shill as much I wanted to think it was someone uninformed but when you think about it. It's rather unlikely in a situation like this.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17si0UgDpR/x/c/4ZA0P2VMhx3