No "normie argument." I am personal testimony to the effect. My eyes are more deeply seated than Biden's. All you can see of my eyelids are the lashes. What do I have to do? Appear before you in person before you accept what I say? Why don't you just make your fantasy complete and declare I am a liar?
You consistently have arguments against basically everything going on. It's hard to understand why you frequent this site. This shouldn't be new for you; I've pointed it out previously.
No, I don't even remotely have arguments "against basically everything going on." I wouldn't have time in the day to breathe, if that were true. I have arguments against poor thinking and fantasy (which, for you, might seem like everything going on). I frequent this site to get news and insight I would get nowhere else. I pitch in to clear out the wooly thinking that contaminates the good thinking. And sometimes I have specific expertise or experience to pit against appalling ignorance. According to Socrates, I should take pride in the number of debates that end with my critic calling me names.
I don't think I'd take pride in that considering your behavior is really more that of a shill than anything else.
Edit: And I'm not "calling you a name." I am pointing out that there is indeed a pattern, and your attitude that you are loftily saving us from our "poor/wooly thinking" is a serious eye-roller.
Once again with The Normie Argument
No "normie argument." I am personal testimony to the effect. My eyes are more deeply seated than Biden's. All you can see of my eyelids are the lashes. What do I have to do? Appear before you in person before you accept what I say? Why don't you just make your fantasy complete and declare I am a liar?
You consistently have arguments against basically everything going on. It's hard to understand why you frequent this site. This shouldn't be new for you; I've pointed it out previously.
No, I don't even remotely have arguments "against basically everything going on." I wouldn't have time in the day to breathe, if that were true. I have arguments against poor thinking and fantasy (which, for you, might seem like everything going on). I frequent this site to get news and insight I would get nowhere else. I pitch in to clear out the wooly thinking that contaminates the good thinking. And sometimes I have specific expertise or experience to pit against appalling ignorance. According to Socrates, I should take pride in the number of debates that end with my critic calling me names.
I don't think I'd take pride in that considering your behavior is really more that of a shill than anything else.
Edit: And I'm not "calling you a name." I am pointing out that there is indeed a pattern, and your attitude that you are loftily saving us from our "poor/wooly thinking" is a serious eye-roller.