There are certainly intel professionals that are tasked with creating disguises, that has been been made public - But that is an entirely different task than impersonation - if you have a source I have not seen I'm super interested.
There is plenty about this in the public domain for a long time now. Just a quick search brings up a few interesting leads
Impersonation is TOUGH. Think of any biopic you've seen recently with 'world class' actors and make-up people, it'll be a good approximation of the individual, but it's certainly not believable or achievable in a day-to-day replace a public figure sense. I don't see how anyone can extrapolate that out to any degree.
They are not really trying to do impersonation at the level of biopics or anything else. Thats why most of us who have watched Joe Biden before 2020 realised very quickly that this guy is not the same. The reason for this, we can speculate, is part of the "WH trolling", where they want to seed the doubts for Awakening all over the place. Same level of trolling as Bill Gates saying if they do a really good job of vaccination they can reduce world population by 20%. Or Biden's video saying how he strong armed Ukraine prosecutor to drop investigation into his company.
It serves dual purpose of keeping this impersonation operation easy, while also using it to troll people.
Again, I think anything else just begs the question more.
Again, if you can articulate the questions, we can keep discussing them. Except for the deep seated belief that "this is too absurd to be real", I have not really seen any arguments that makes this impossible.
There is plenty about this in the public domain for a long time now. Just a quick search brings up a few interesting leads
I have seen those sources and it's very cool, but again disguise != impersonation.
Again, if you can articulate the questions, we can keep discussing them.
The problem with conversations about this topic, or body doubles, or god forbid 'clones', is that the burden of proof does not rest with me. I can ask a ton of questions (and do), but get hand-wavy answers ("they're trolling", for instance), or if someone wants to move beyond hand waving, the questions would be too pointed for any person not in on the job to speculate about. Asking questions about vague speculation is rough.
But, I'm curious so we can start with a baseline- It seems to me that you believe that Joe Biden has been replaced. Can you say when, and can you say with which method(s) he has been replaced?
"They're trolling" Is not really addressing, but waving your hand at it. So I'll ask again, you seem to believe Joe Biden is a replacement - so when did this occur (there should a pretty marked change in public images), and by which means (mask, double, clone, a mix).
"They're trolling" Is not really addressing, but waving your hand at it.
If I said something like "don't worry about impersonation, it can be done" that would be hand waving. Thats not what I said. I actually pointed out that "bad impersonation_ is one of the reasons why we all started questioning whether Biden is different. Whether the current "Biden" behaves like the old Biden is not something I have seen anyone argue about.
Do you disagree? Do you think the Biden we see is consistent in his behaviour with the old (pre 2016) Biden? If a biopic was made of Biden, and the actor acted the same way as the current Biden, would you consider it a "very accurate impersonation" ?
so when did this occur (there should a pretty marked change in public images)
This clip in 2016 is pretty coherent but seems to be a little off.
This clip in 2018 is definitely a replacement, but still looks better impersonation than the guy right now.
This clip in 2021 looks a lot more like the guy we see currently.
The replacement happened sometime between 2014 and 2018. Personally I think the guy in the 2016 clip was a replacement who put a LOT of effort into impersonation. The guy in 2018 clip was a replacement guy who put a little less effort in impersonation. And the guy since 2021 is very bad at impersonation. Again, all by design.
by which means (mask, double, clone, a mix).
The thing I am 100% convinced is that the guy was replaced. For me, either the guy has been replaced or this entire Plan is a failure. You wont put your Top Enemy with incredible connections as the public face and expect him to go along with the plan, no matter what kind of leverage you have on him. He would rather see his entire family butchered than meekly submit. He would rather have his brains explode on live TV than allow the People to win.
To answer "by which means", we have to do a bit of critical thinking. I would think that purely from a Operational point of view, you would need multiple replacements. I am going to go ahead and eliminate clone because I have not seen any basis to believe cloning technology exists to this level, and if there is such a technology - that the clone would not do same things as the original.
By "double" I assume you mean someone who looks just like Biden, with a bit of make up. Its possible. Perhaps one of the replacement is a double. Still there would be heavy use of disguise, even if not an outright mask. Also from an Operational point of view, its much more manageable to go down the mask route than
Mask option seems to be more likely, and its highly probably that at least one replacement is a mask wearer.We have also seen times when things looked odd, as if he was wearing a mask - intentional sloppiness - again part of the calibrated Awakening which I call "trolling". So I tend to believe that atleast one replacement is a mask wearer.
There is plenty about this in the public domain for a long time now. Just a quick search brings up a few interesting leads
A Former CIA Chief of Disguise Shows Off a Five-Second Mask
How Hyperreal Masks Keep Fooling People from 2020
An interview with Robert Barron crafted state-of-the-art silicone masks for CIA operatives, disguises that needed to pass close scrutiny from six to 12 inches away.
Celebrity Duplication and CIA Stunts with Analogue Mask Technology: Unveiling the Art and Ethics of Hyper-Realistic Disguises - Latest study dropped on researchgate.
They are not really trying to do impersonation at the level of biopics or anything else. Thats why most of us who have watched Joe Biden before 2020 realised very quickly that this guy is not the same. The reason for this, we can speculate, is part of the "WH trolling", where they want to seed the doubts for Awakening all over the place. Same level of trolling as Bill Gates saying if they do a really good job of vaccination they can reduce world population by 20%. Or Biden's video saying how he strong armed Ukraine prosecutor to drop investigation into his company.
It serves dual purpose of keeping this impersonation operation easy, while also using it to troll people.
Again, if you can articulate the questions, we can keep discussing them. Except for the deep seated belief that "this is too absurd to be real", I have not really seen any arguments that makes this impossible.
I have seen those sources and it's very cool, but again disguise != impersonation.
The problem with conversations about this topic, or body doubles, or god forbid 'clones', is that the burden of proof does not rest with me. I can ask a ton of questions (and do), but get hand-wavy answers ("they're trolling", for instance), or if someone wants to move beyond hand waving, the questions would be too pointed for any person not in on the job to speculate about. Asking questions about vague speculation is rough.
But, I'm curious so we can start with a baseline- It seems to me that you believe that Joe Biden has been replaced. Can you say when, and can you say with which method(s) he has been replaced?
Already addressed.
"They're trolling" Is not really addressing, but waving your hand at it. So I'll ask again, you seem to believe Joe Biden is a replacement - so when did this occur (there should a pretty marked change in public images), and by which means (mask, double, clone, a mix).
If I said something like "don't worry about impersonation, it can be done" that would be hand waving. Thats not what I said. I actually pointed out that "bad impersonation_ is one of the reasons why we all started questioning whether Biden is different. Whether the current "Biden" behaves like the old Biden is not something I have seen anyone argue about.
Do you disagree? Do you think the Biden we see is consistent in his behaviour with the old (pre 2016) Biden? If a biopic was made of Biden, and the actor acted the same way as the current Biden, would you consider it a "very accurate impersonation" ?
This clip in 2014 is the real Joe Biden.
This clip in 2016 is pretty coherent but seems to be a little off.
This clip in 2018 is definitely a replacement, but still looks better impersonation than the guy right now.
This clip in 2021 looks a lot more like the guy we see currently.
The replacement happened sometime between 2014 and 2018. Personally I think the guy in the 2016 clip was a replacement who put a LOT of effort into impersonation. The guy in 2018 clip was a replacement guy who put a little less effort in impersonation. And the guy since 2021 is very bad at impersonation. Again, all by design.
The thing I am 100% convinced is that the guy was replaced. For me, either the guy has been replaced or this entire Plan is a failure. You wont put your Top Enemy with incredible connections as the public face and expect him to go along with the plan, no matter what kind of leverage you have on him. He would rather see his entire family butchered than meekly submit. He would rather have his brains explode on live TV than allow the People to win.
To answer "by which means", we have to do a bit of critical thinking. I would think that purely from a Operational point of view, you would need multiple replacements. I am going to go ahead and eliminate clone because I have not seen any basis to believe cloning technology exists to this level, and if there is such a technology - that the clone would not do same things as the original.
By "double" I assume you mean someone who looks just like Biden, with a bit of make up. Its possible. Perhaps one of the replacement is a double. Still there would be heavy use of disguise, even if not an outright mask. Also from an Operational point of view, its much more manageable to go down the mask route than
Mask option seems to be more likely, and its highly probably that at least one replacement is a mask wearer.We have also seen times when things looked odd, as if he was wearing a mask - intentional sloppiness - again part of the calibrated Awakening which I call "trolling". So I tend to believe that atleast one replacement is a mask wearer.