https://briancates.substack.com/p/trumps-takeover-of-the-rnc-continues
Another aimed-at-your-normie-friends column from former normie Brian Cates, in this case describing the utter devastation that Trump and MAGA have wrought on the quisling "conservative" movement. As usual, it's an entertaining read even for the long-awake (well, for me at least). An excerpt below:
They never fought for us. Not only were they NOT fighting for us, but Conservative, Inc. was a vital control tool of the UniParty Forever Wars Machine.
They never had anything but contempt for us. But they did manage to fool millions of us.
Until Trump showed up and became the face of our movement, and they were forced to start TELLING US what they really thought about us. The shock of their being trolled into doing that cannot be underestimated during this currently ongoing Great Awakening.
The Conservative Inc. and the Progressive Inc. wings of the media are run by the same UniParty.
They've been engaged in a massive psychological operation against the rest of us for decades now.
It should be easier to takeover each state RNC apparatus now that the national party has been taken over by America First.
The national takeover of RNC is a really, really good indicator as it was suspected that RNC was going to block Trump from getting the nomination at the convention (ala Reagan being blocked in 1976 by shenanigans). The America First Party structure creation (which was likely a backup plan per Andrew Jackson's creation of Democratic Party for his nationalist run in 1828) no longer appears to be necessary post RINO purge.
However, look out for attempt to have 4 candidates in 2024 Presidential Election to split the Electoral College to keep Trump below 270. This is a well-known cabal play used both in 1824 and 1924 elections with more than 2 candidates for POTUS.
I think all elections have had more than 2 candidates for POTUS. At least in my lifetime, there's been at least 3. There's always someone running as Independent.
Remember how so many women were upset that Jill Stein was running under the Green Party in 2016, because they thought she was taking the female vote away from Clinton? Many people were saying that Hillary would have won if Stein hadn't run.
So, yeah, I don't see how that can be a cabal play when virtually every election has had more than 2 candidates for POTUS.
More precisely: 3 or more candidates that get at least 1 electoral college vote. One must get at least 1 electoral vote to be eligible for selection as POTUS by House of Rep per current procedure. Jill Stein and even Ross Perot have never won any states from what I recall.
In 1824 and 1924 at least 3 candidates won at least 1 state.
Ok....so you think the candidates in 1824 and 1924 were given those wins by the cabal?
I believe they were manipulated by foreign entities, most likely based in London, for the purpose of determining the outcome. JQA (1824) appears to have been a British agent via his wife handler suspected of working for British intelligence. He likely was blackmailed or controlled while he was Secretary of State the 8 years prior to 1824.
He was then used to block Andrew Jackson in 1824 to delay the nullification of Bank #2 (1816-1836) imposed by British force as condition for ending War of 1812.