There's no hearing. He filed a petition. That's it.

Specifically he is filing a pettion for a "Writ of Certiorari" which means he is asking the Supreme Court to take the case. But nothing is going to happen tomorrow.

it's basically going to go behind all the petitions to the Supreme Court. I don't know how long that takes.

The Case is Lake vs Fontes, the Kari Lake lawsuit out of Arizona and I think this is the last ruling in that case https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/10/16/22-16413.pdf

He's got a website explaining what his plan is https://lindelloffensefund.org/

The Lake vs. Fontes case calls for SCOTUS to issue a Writ of Certiorari to the Arizona 9th circuit court which has thus far refused to address evidence of election manipulation using electronic voting systems. Now, even more compelling, and explosive evidence is being submitted to the SCOTUS.

This case started in Arizona calling for an injunction against the machines featuring Kari Lake and Mark Finchem as plaintiffs. Maricopa County Judge Peter Thompson dismissed the lawsuit initially based on standing and assertions that our claims were “speculative”. It then went to the Arizona Court of Appeals which affirmed the dismissal. An appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court also ended with affirmation of the dismissal. The case was then appealed again after this ruling to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals where the dismissal was once again affirmed. The LOF attorneys who continued to pursue the case, including Alan Dershowitz, were sanctioned.

The courts have repeatedly dismissed this case on standing, not lack of evidence. It should be noted that “standing” is a judge’s decision that does not require explanation. The Writ of Certiorari is used in rare cases when the case has national significance or is precedent setting. In both instances, this case meets those criteria.

Our case has been delivered to the Supreme Court Today. The petition will be shared once the case has been docketed.

Great ! Danke sehr !