Honestly pretty easy call to sell Boeing with all the issues they’ve been having on their planes and the whistleblower, DOJ investigation just the cherry on top
If any of us found out we were about to lose $25,000, and there were no consequences to stopping that, we’d probably do this, too.
The problem isn’t that they do it, it’s that they can do it.
Are we able to file insider trading charges against them for this? If not, can we get a piece of legislation pushed that forces them to put investments into some sort of blind management? Easier said than done, surely, but worth thinking about.
Good catch, sloppy wording on my part. They aren’t technically insiders.
Insiders would be within the company. They’re doing what we would typically consider to be insider trading, but the law doesn’t address legislators or regulators that I’ve ever heard of.
Of course regulators shouldn’t exist at all, as the entire 4th branch is either unconstitutional oversteps or abdications of defined 3-branch duties.
Just a coincidence I am sure! No insider information going on here! Ask Martha Stewart!
This guy https://keating.house.gov/policy-work/committees-and-caucuses
Thank you. MA. DS stronghold.
Doing a "Pelosi."
Honestly pretty easy call to sell Boeing with all the issues they’ve been having on their planes and the whistleblower, DOJ investigation just the cherry on top
Could this be sabotage? What do you think?
Nothing to see here. Move along...
Yes. Nothing to see. You are a conspiracy theorist if you think there's something there.
Mr. Keating seems to have picked up a lot of great insider contacts while going to school and being employed at Welton Academy. :)
Yes. It's a lot of contacts.
Let’s be fair, here.
If any of us found out we were about to lose $25,000, and there were no consequences to stopping that, we’d probably do this, too.
The problem isn’t that they do it, it’s that they can do it.
Are we able to file insider trading charges against them for this? If not, can we get a piece of legislation pushed that forces them to put investments into some sort of blind management? Easier said than done, surely, but worth thinking about.
I thought insider trading is not allowed by SEC? We don't need any more legislation, just need to enforce what is here.
Good catch, sloppy wording on my part. They aren’t technically insiders.
Insiders would be within the company. They’re doing what we would typically consider to be insider trading, but the law doesn’t address legislators or regulators that I’ve ever heard of.
Of course regulators shouldn’t exist at all, as the entire 4th branch is either unconstitutional oversteps or abdications of defined 3-branch duties.