The Court "finds itself unable to place any stock" in the testimony of Terrence Bradley. McAfee also said Robin Yeartie's testimony "lacked context and detail." And he considered the Wade cellphone info but said it didn't say conclusively when the relationship started.
The Court ruled that there was "no material financial benefit" derived by Willis in hiring and engaging in a personal relationship with Wade.
I wonder if a higher court could rule differently should the issue comes up again? Either way, the evidence is injected into the system.
I wonder if a higher court could rule differently should the issue comes up again? Either way, the evidence is injected into the system.