So it's a petition to the Supreme Court to review the Kari Lake court case in Arizona.
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Kari Lake and Mark Finchem respectfully
petition this Court for a writ of certiorari to the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to review the
dismissal of their case. Respondents are Arizona’s
Secretary of State and the boards of supervisors of
Maricopa and Pima Counties in their respective
official capacities
I do find that case 23A622, Lake v. Fontes, had a filing due date of 2024-03-14, which agrees with Lindell's statement, so that might be a match. However, your filing does not mention Lindell so it's not clear yet whether this is his biggie, but it could well be. Your text is the unfiled, undated version so it should still be considered a draft, but may well be an authoritative enough one.
In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.
So it's a petition to the Supreme Court to review the Kari Lake court case in Arizona.
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Kari Lake and Mark Finchem respectfully petition this Court for a writ of certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to review the dismissal of their case. Respondents are Arizona’s Secretary of State and the boards of supervisors of Maricopa and Pima Counties in their respective official capacities
I found the PDF from an Arizona reporter.
I do find that case 23A622, Lake v. Fontes, had a filing due date of 2024-03-14, which agrees with Lindell's statement, so that might be a match. However, your filing does not mention Lindell so it's not clear yet whether this is his biggie, but it could well be. Your text is the unfiled, undated version so it should still be considered a draft, but may well be an authoritative enough one.
No this is Lindell's case. He is paying for the case. but he is not a party to the case.
It's the same case he mentions here. https://lindelloffensefund.org/
That's correct. HEADER:DECRYPTION KEYS FOUND IN VOTING MACHINES! I found the case at his site, as well, linked by Mike Lindell: https://electioncrimebureau.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/23-_PetitionForWritOfCertiorari.pdf
Does he have the proof of this case that will actually be reviewed?
No.
He does not.
https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/about