I think I found Mike LIndell's Supreme Court Document - The Great Awakening

I think I found Mike LIndell's Supreme Court Document (s3.documentcloud.org)

posted 259 days ago by WHOSkiddingWhO 259 days ago by WHOSkiddingWhO +56 / -0

6 comments

6 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (6)

sorted by:

▲ 5 ▼

– SwampRangers 5 points 259 days ago +5 / -0

I do find that case 23A622, Lake v. Fontes, had a filing due date of 2024-03-14, which agrees with Lindell's statement, so that might be a match. However, your filing does not mention Lindell so it's not clear yet whether this is his biggie, but it could well be. Your text is the unfiled, undated version so it should still be considered a draft, but may well be an authoritative enough one.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 8 ▼

– WHOSkiddingWhO [S] 8 points 259 days ago +8 / -0

No this is Lindell's case. He is paying for the case. but he is not a party to the case.

It's the same case he mentions here. https://lindelloffensefund.org/

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– PowderRoomPolitics 2 points 259 days ago +2 / -0

That's correct. HEADER:DECRYPTION KEYS FOUND IN VOTING MACHINES! I found the case at his site, as well, linked by Mike Lindell: https://electioncrimebureau.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/23-_PetitionForWritOfCertiorari.pdf

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– PopcornTastesGood 1 point 259 days ago +1 / -0

Does he have the proof of this case that will actually be reviewed?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -1 ▼

– WHOSkiddingWhO [S] -1 points 259 days ago +1 / -2

No.

He does not.

In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/about

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q