The Q statements are so cryptic, they have become Rorschach blots. The Q following read their own conspiracies into them. "Implication"? Implied by Q or by his reader? I don't see a lick of scientific feasibility in the notion, and I don't back down from questioning "Q" (if it is indeed Q and not someone over-presenting an ambiguous statement).
Please don't lecture me about possibilities. I mentioned that I designed and patented microchips that could be full-fledged radios, small enough to be aerosols. They haven't happened yet. There is no jump between these particles and what you are talking about.
The Q statements are so cryptic, they have become Rorschach blots. The Q following read their own conspiracies into them. "Implication"? Implied by Q or by his reader? I don't see a lick of scientific feasibility in the notion, and I don't back down from questioning "Q" (if it is indeed Q and not someone over-presenting an ambiguous statement).
Please don't lecture me about possibilities. I mentioned that I designed and patented microchips that could be full-fledged radios, small enough to be aerosols. They haven't happened yet. There is no jump between these particles and what you are talking about.