This feels like a setup. Part of the allure of Trump was that he was mostly self-funded. He wasn't beholden to anyone but the people he made his campaign speech promises to.
Adding in a bunch of Billionaires who are not supposedly going to "donate" hundreds of millions to him" could create just enough wiggle room for some kind of quid quo pro accusation where the left now claims Trump is selling influence.
I don't think he should be anywhere near this, it feels like a honey pot.
This feels like a setup. Part of the allure of Trump was that he was mostly self-funded. He wasn't beholden to anyone but the people he made his campaign speech promises to.
Adding in a bunch of Billionaires who are not supposedly going to "donate" hundreds of millions to him" could create just enough wiggle room for some kind of quid quo pro accusation where the left now claims Trump is selling influence.
I don't think he should be anywhere near this, it feels like a honey pot.
Donate ? You mean get back when case overturned. That's how bonds work.
Trump would probably pay them back with interest.
Interest should be illegal.
Come to think of it, what IS the cut off for "usury"?