Monarchy isn't a Bad Thing
🤔💭 Theory 😲💡
I feel like this is an extremely unpopular opinion but I really don't think republicanism was a step forward for humanity.
Monarchy is the most intuitive form of government. People tend to take care of what they own, and politicians have no incentive to leave anything better for the next generation because they really have no stake in their country. Their legacy dies with them.
A monarchy with constitutional (and familial) checks and balances is vastly preferable to a republic where the foreign interests run free and loot the taxpayers. It's pure and much simpler. No Congress, no Supreme Court, no ridiculous sham elections. Everyone knows who's in charge and what the rules are.
Seriously?
The only reason America exists, is because they left the monarchy. Also, I’m not sure if you’re aware, but just about everyone who’s part of a royal family, is part of the satanic Cabal and are pedophiles. So no, I don’t support the monarchy. These people are evil through and through. They could care less about the plebs.
More and more, I dis agree with so many of the things that you post. Most of them I just don’t engage with though. But today… I’m just saying.
Username checks out 😂😂😂
Have a great day though. 👍
Me thinks he’d be much happier in Canada or UK or perhaps Australia— this isn’t the country to fulfill his/her needs— then report back after YEARS in said countries - How DO YOU LIKE ME NOW! cringe— I’m sorry you feel so hopeless and victimized by your birth into your generation but you know every human in earth was an accident of birth and most dealt with the cards dealt or they perished— like l told my kids “life’s a bitch and then you die” that doesn’t mean find enjoyment in everyday - I just means life is difficult and you need to deal with it and still be happy and enjoy as many moments as possible— animals do — be like a cardinal or a coyote
Let me start a discussion here. The point I will be making is that the issue of monarchy is not exactly a cut and dry black and white issue.
If you see the current world and trace back how the Satanists took control of everything, you can trace this iteration back to the establishment of the Bank of England (incidentally in the area burnt to ground in 1666).
And that could only happen after a rebellion was fomented against the monarchy and Oliver Cromwell took control and allowed Jews to return back to England 10 years before the Great Fire of London. Jews had been expelled by King Edward in 1200's
So for the very first step towards Satanic takeover, they had to wait 400 years before they could finally disrupt the monarchy enough to get a foothold.
But that was just the beginning. They had a whole bunch of monarchies to subvert before they could start on the their NWO. For this, next step was to create America outside the Monarchy and use it as a power base to bring down all the monarchies.
They needed two revolutions, establishment of a new American Democracy/Republic (they wanted a democracy, but they got a republic so they had extra wok cut out), a civil war, colonisation of the whole world and two world wars before they could take out all the monarchies and start on their final step.
Everything between 1600s to 1945 has been about getting rid of the last bastions for Human freedom - the Monarchies. Its not a coincidence that Israel was created in 1947 two years after that. Also not a coincidence that the Balfour declaration happened right after WW1 - which is the war that took out most of the European monarchies.
Fall of the monarchies and rise of the NWO - it goes hand in hand.
The next stage of this discussion is the creation of America and what its original goal was, and how the people of America proved their Greatness despite all the odds against them from the day one.
👏👏👏 And with all of this in play, I would not put it past the deep state, or the Cabal, or whatever you wanna call them… To subvert the monarchies, and turn them into Satanic pedophiles. So the ones that are left, are pure evil!
This, I agree.
BTW that reminds me, I am really curious to find out what Trump meant when he said, about Queen Elizabeth 2, that she never once made a mistake in her long reign.
I don’t know what that means either. But he wasn’t around her entire life and doesn’t know everything she’s ever done. So I’m not sure how he can speak to her entire life.
But I always have to keep in mind, there is that picture of Epstein in Gizlane in front of her cabin. Also, her nephew ? Prince Philip was accused of pedophilia and hung out quite a bit with Epstein. And there’s that pesky jimmy Saville, that was hanging out in the castle. So I’m not so sure how clean her hands are. Also, there’s her son, whoever the king is now - who had an affair with that wretched woman who is now queen entendre. 😂😂😂
Well... Not every monarchy was as bad as the English monarchy.
After all, they didn't last anywhere near as long.
Where a monarchy is successful, however, is getting things done promptly and when we look at our charade of a government I can see why OP would crave that.
The blood in my veins -- like yours, presumably -- compels my distaste towards monarchs, but I will recognize there were a few positive aspects in a monarchy that cares about its people.
Traditionally, they were easier to overthrow as well because they could only field armies of common folk who had families that were fed up.
Actually English monarchy, just like all other European monarchies, was perfectly good and was ensuring God's laws were being followed and their peoples lived prosperously.
It was when, after 400 years, the Khazarians finally managed to put their toes back into the country and then managed to establish a Central bank, that it slowly became what it became. The blood line thats on the throne right now is not even the same as the bloodline before all this happened.
Don't strike a match , cringerepublic is gas lighting the world where the trend away from Monarchy's has been steadily declining for a few hundred years.
Just likes sniffing it's own farts.