Pardon me; that may be true but 1) it is inconsequential. You still understand what he means and it doesn't change the information he posted.
2) That is a rude way to speak to a fellow frog. I suggest it would be better to thank him for his post. After thanking him, then, if you want, you could make a gentle correction. Not everyone has had the opportunity to have the education you have.
I think the comment was aimed at the article not at OP. I must confess I didn't read the article or the Emergency Request so I don't know if the error is on OP or if OP was just copying and pasting from the article as it seems.
I also recognize I may be wrong and the commenter was just being an asshole. I am just sharing how I took it when I read it.
ok, I am back after reading the article and it was not aimed at OP, it was aimed at the author of the article that wrote Import.
The fucker that wrote this doesn't know what IMPORT means.
Pardon me; that may be true but 1) it is inconsequential. You still understand what he means and it doesn't change the information he posted. 2) That is a rude way to speak to a fellow frog. I suggest it would be better to thank him for his post. After thanking him, then, if you want, you could make a gentle correction. Not everyone has had the opportunity to have the education you have.
I think the comment was aimed at the article not at OP. I must confess I didn't read the article or the Emergency Request so I don't know if the error is on OP or if OP was just copying and pasting from the article as it seems.
I also recognize I may be wrong and the commenter was just being an asshole. I am just sharing how I took it when I read it.
ok, I am back after reading the article and it was not aimed at OP, it was aimed at the author of the article that wrote Import.