Pardon me; that may be true but 1) it is inconsequential. You still understand what he means and it doesn't change the information he posted.
2) That is a rude way to speak to a fellow frog. I suggest it would be better to thank him for his post. After thanking him, then, if you want, you could make a gentle correction. Not everyone has had the opportunity to have the education you have.
I think the comment was aimed at the article not at OP. I must confess I didn't read the article or the Emergency Request so I don't know if the error is on OP or if OP was just copying and pasting from the article as it seems.
I also recognize I may be wrong and the commenter was just being an asshole. I am just sharing how I took it when I read it.
ok, I am back after reading the article and it was not aimed at OP, it was aimed at the author of the article that wrote Import.
Pardon me; that may be true but 1) it is inconsequential. You still understand what he means and it doesn't change the information he posted. 2) That is a rude way to speak to a fellow frog. I suggest it would be better to thank him for his post. After thanking him, then, if you want, you could make a gentle correction. Not everyone has had the opportunity to have the education you have.
I was quoting the article, which couldn't differentiate import from deport. You'd think the journalist at least had an education.
Deportants are important.
I knew what you were referring to. No harm done.
I think the comment was aimed at the article not at OP. I must confess I didn't read the article or the Emergency Request so I don't know if the error is on OP or if OP was just copying and pasting from the article as it seems.
I also recognize I may be wrong and the commenter was just being an asshole. I am just sharing how I took it when I read it.
ok, I am back after reading the article and it was not aimed at OP, it was aimed at the author of the article that wrote Import.