This is vindication for me. I've been trying to tell people who like this guy that he's just regurgitating old DD from Superstonk for his market analysis and anon research from over the years for everything else. He never says ANYTHING NEW, HE JUST STEALS.
Folks, I cannot emphasize this enough: If they show their face while telling OLD INFORMATION, they are building a B R A N D. They're grifters riding off the coattails of others, passing off the hard work of other researchers as if they found it themselves. Instead of putting the information front and center, he throws himself into the spotlight (like many others) to make it seem like HE'S THE VOICE OF REASON. IT'S ALL BRANDING.
"Be careful who you follow." - Q
Not all who do it are grifters, but I would not be shocked if this dude has merch or something in mind he wants to bring up soon.
EDIT: ANOTHER HUGE RED FLAG: HE NEVER GIVES SOURCES! That is always a HUGE deal to me, and how I know he's just stealing others research (even though I've heard it and read it all years before he started trying to pass it off as his own). If he gave sources, he'd just be linking to the research he's regurgitating and would easily be called out for it.
Because he likes RFK JR he is deepstate? This is getting pathetic. Where is the evidence RFK is deep state. This is actual cult like behavior that the left does.
Where did I say that? I'm saying he's a grifter, IDGAF if he's deepstate or not. You're completely ignoring my argument, I'm saying he does nothing but steal others work and pass it off as his own WITHOUT PROVIDING SOURCES.
That's not providing a linkable source. Imagine trying to pass off a thesis paper with screenshots but no work cited page, that's what he does. He just points to stuff on the camera, usually because he's pointing at screenshots of stolen work. If he actually wanted people to look more into this stuff himself, he'd link to his sources. He doesn't want that though, he wants people looking at him and him alone, aka, branding himself. Every single time I see one of his videos posted here or on superstonk, it's always the same.
EDIT 2: https://cancelthisclothingcompany.com/shop/ This is literally Ian's Tshirt shop, the same branding as his YouTube channel that can be found all linked in his Twitter Bio. GRADE A GRIFTER, CONFIRMED. Archive.org snapshot
This is vindication for me. I've been trying to tell people who like this guy that he's just regurgitating old DD from Superstonk for his market analysis and anon research from over the years for everything else. He never says ANYTHING NEW, HE JUST STEALS.
Folks, I cannot emphasize this enough: If they show their face while telling OLD INFORMATION, they are building a B R A N D. They're grifters riding off the coattails of others, passing off the hard work of other researchers as if they found it themselves. Instead of putting the information front and center, he throws himself into the spotlight (like many others) to make it seem like HE'S THE VOICE OF REASON. IT'S ALL BRANDING.
"Be careful who you follow." - Q
Not all who do it are grifters, but I would not be shocked if this dude has merch or something in mind he wants to bring up soon.
EDIT: ANOTHER HUGE RED FLAG: HE NEVER GIVES SOURCES! That is always a HUGE deal to me, and how I know he's just stealing others research (even though I've heard it and read it all years before he started trying to pass it off as his own). If he gave sources, he'd just be linking to the research he's regurgitating and would easily be called out for it.
Because he likes RFK JR he is deepstate? This is getting pathetic. Where is the evidence RFK is deep state. This is actual cult like behavior that the left does.
Where did I say that? I'm saying he's a grifter, IDGAF if he's deepstate or not. You're completely ignoring my argument, I'm saying he does nothing but steal others work and pass it off as his own WITHOUT PROVIDING SOURCES.
I have watched plenty of his tik toks. He has the evidence in the background lmao.
That's not providing a linkable source. Imagine trying to pass off a thesis paper with screenshots but no work cited page, that's what he does. He just points to stuff on the camera, usually because he's pointing at screenshots of stolen work. If he actually wanted people to look more into this stuff himself, he'd link to his sources. He doesn't want that though, he wants people looking at him and him alone, aka, branding himself. Every single time I see one of his videos posted here or on superstonk, it's always the same.
And further case in point, look at the reaction from myself and others to his TikTok ban argument. The moment he has to make his own case for something (since there was no research he could steal), he shows he knows absolutely nothing.