That's not providing a linkable source. Imagine trying to pass off a thesis paper with screenshots but no work cited page, that's what he does. He just points to stuff on the camera, usually because he's pointing at screenshots of stolen work. If he actually wanted people to look more into this stuff himself, he'd link to his sources. He doesn't want that though, he wants people looking at him and him alone, aka, branding himself. Every single time I see one of his videos posted here or on superstonk, it's always the same.
I have watched plenty of his tik toks. He has the evidence in the background lmao.
That's not providing a linkable source. Imagine trying to pass off a thesis paper with screenshots but no work cited page, that's what he does. He just points to stuff on the camera, usually because he's pointing at screenshots of stolen work. If he actually wanted people to look more into this stuff himself, he'd link to his sources. He doesn't want that though, he wants people looking at him and him alone, aka, branding himself. Every single time I see one of his videos posted here or on superstonk, it's always the same.
Social media isn’t a PHD thesis paper Jesus Christ do you understand how tik tok works?
Yes, it has a description section and a comment section where you can post your sources.
Obvious moving of goalposts for your ridiculous "never gives sources" statement.
And so what? He puts the studies he sites in a screen shot in the background of his videos. Plenty of other truth tellers do the same thing.
If he was disinfo he is pretty bad at it. Sorry brother but I just think you are doing puritan stuff and we can agree to disagree.
I don’t think Ian Carroll is deep state until I get actual evidence he and/or RFK JR are.
I cant believe this got downvotes. Smh.
And further case in point, look at the reaction from myself and others to his TikTok ban argument. The moment he has to make his own case for something (since there was no research he could steal), he shows he knows absolutely nothing.
Was that meant for someone else, cause that makes absolutely no sense when discussing the argument at hand.
Yes it was my bad deleted it