If all war is based on deception this doesn’t mean anything. Why would RFK be allowed to talk about vaccines, blackrock/vanguard and the deep state if he was a black hat?
I get what you mean, and I agree since Q repeatedly said in some of his first posts "disinformation is necessary." However, your logic can apply to guys like Alex Jones, who is controlled by Mossad and Q even called out when he was active:
It's that concept of "the best place to hide the truth is in a lie." I personally am still up in the air on RFK as a whole (remember, YOU said I thought he was deep state, I NEVER SAID THAT ANYWHERE, PERIOD), my only gripe is the concept of taking votes from Trump. Which, when speaking about Ian Carroll, is what upsets me and makes me think all he is a grift (again, YOU SAID I THOUGHT HE WAS DEEP STATE, NOT ME). If he really wanted to be bold and stand out, he would have endorsed Trump, especially after all he's exposed and discussed. Instead, he takes the easy road and remains neutral by supporting RFK rather than Biden or Trump. Which means he gets to keep the leftists in his audience watching. This also happens with guys like Joe Rogan, who I absolutely love and tell people here they should listen to if they want to hear what the average person is thinking right now. I never think they're on some team or apart of some conspiracy, I just think they want to remain neutral and not flat out say they support Trump since that would instantly alienate a large portion of their fan base. And in both Joe and Ian's case, they aren't saying their audience should or shouldn't do something, they're just giving their opinion. However, Joe interviews others, Ian tries to pass others work off as his own, which is my complaint and why I keep saying he's just a grifter.
If we want to shift the conversation to whether or not RFK is deep state or not, I don't think he is. If anything, he has definitely done us a great service by exposing the vaccine narrative to leftists. That's about it, though. Is he a part of Q team? IDK, doesn't change my mind on anything.
And so what? He puts the studies he sites in a screen shot in the background of his videos. Plenty of other truth tellers do the same thing.
If he was disinfo he is pretty bad at it. Sorry brother but I just think you are doing puritan stuff and we can agree to disagree.
I don’t think Ian Carroll is deep state until I get actual evidence he and/or RFK JR are.
https://twitter.com/HomeboyLelo/status/1714534349989703886
If all war is based on deception this doesn’t mean anything. Why would RFK be allowed to talk about vaccines, blackrock/vanguard and the deep state if he was a black hat?
I get what you mean, and I agree since Q repeatedly said in some of his first posts "disinformation is necessary." However, your logic can apply to guys like Alex Jones, who is controlled by Mossad and Q even called out when he was active:
u/#q1341 u/#q2101
It's that concept of "the best place to hide the truth is in a lie." I personally am still up in the air on RFK as a whole (remember, YOU said I thought he was deep state, I NEVER SAID THAT ANYWHERE, PERIOD), my only gripe is the concept of taking votes from Trump. Which, when speaking about Ian Carroll, is what upsets me and makes me think all he is a grift (again, YOU SAID I THOUGHT HE WAS DEEP STATE, NOT ME). If he really wanted to be bold and stand out, he would have endorsed Trump, especially after all he's exposed and discussed. Instead, he takes the easy road and remains neutral by supporting RFK rather than Biden or Trump. Which means he gets to keep the leftists in his audience watching. This also happens with guys like Joe Rogan, who I absolutely love and tell people here they should listen to if they want to hear what the average person is thinking right now. I never think they're on some team or apart of some conspiracy, I just think they want to remain neutral and not flat out say they support Trump since that would instantly alienate a large portion of their fan base. And in both Joe and Ian's case, they aren't saying their audience should or shouldn't do something, they're just giving their opinion. However, Joe interviews others, Ian tries to pass others work off as his own, which is my complaint and why I keep saying he's just a grifter.
If we want to shift the conversation to whether or not RFK is deep state or not, I don't think he is. If anything, he has definitely done us a great service by exposing the vaccine narrative to leftists. That's about it, though. Is he a part of Q team? IDK, doesn't change my mind on anything.