He shows his sources period. But ok you think he should make wiki citation style walls of text for all his tiktok videos. You could always contact him and tell him this.
I just hope he keeps spreading eye opening redpill videos full of crowd-sourced information to millions of normies. Or "stealing peoples research" as you call it.
And you seriously get in arguments with people irl about where he sTeALs his facts from!? You do that instead of being glad they are waking up, and pointing them in the direction of more (sToLeN) info to help them open their eyes? Thats not something to be proud of.
He shows his sources period. But ok you think he should make walls of text out of those sources for all his tiktok videos. You could always contact him and tell him this.
All I'm asking for is the link back to the superstonk DD, the Q research, news article, website, or the Twitter thread he got his info from. It would literally be one link to the already written and completed research that already has that source inside of it. This strawman about a wall of text doesn't negate my point at all.
And I agree he's doing a service by spreading the word, but he would be doing an even greater service by pointing people in a direction where they can do their own research by seeing THE ORIGINAL STUFF. By not linking back to it and trying to pass it off as his own, he does everyone a disservice.
The people I argue with about him irl are already awake. Again, from my previous comment:
I just get in arguments over this guy irl all the time trying to point this very thing out that he never sources anything and he's just trying to pass off other's info as his own.
The debate I'm having with you right now is the exact same debate I have with the already awake irl. He's doing both the researchers and the viewers a disservice by not linking back to the original and letting people see more for themselves.
I haven't backpedaled at all, he's literally a grifter branding himself with other people's work. If he linked to the original source with all the other DD people could be reading on top of what he covers, I wouldn't have a problem with him. He passes it off as his own while branding himself. IDK how many times I have to say that.
He shows his sources period. But ok you think he should make wiki citation style walls of text for all his tiktok videos. You could always contact him and tell him this.
I just hope he keeps spreading eye opening redpill videos full of crowd-sourced information to millions of normies. Or "stealing peoples research" as you call it.
And you seriously get in arguments with people irl about where he sTeALs his facts from!? You do that instead of being glad they are waking up, and pointing them in the direction of more (sToLeN) info to help them open their eyes? Thats not something to be proud of.
All I'm asking for is the link back to the superstonk DD, the Q research, news article, website, or the Twitter thread he got his info from. It would literally be one link to the already written and completed research that already has that source inside of it. This strawman about a wall of text doesn't negate my point at all.
And I agree he's doing a service by spreading the word, but he would be doing an even greater service by pointing people in a direction where they can do their own research by seeing THE ORIGINAL STUFF. By not linking back to it and trying to pass it off as his own, he does everyone a disservice.
The people I argue with about him irl are already awake. Again, from my previous comment:
The debate I'm having with you right now is the exact same debate I have with the already awake irl. He's doing both the researchers and the viewers a disservice by not linking back to the original and letting people see more for themselves.
He doesnt try to pass off crowd-sourced info as his own. He shows his sources in the videos. He is not a grifter.
Youre just back-peddling from "He is a grifter" to "But he doesnt present his sources in an easily clickable format".
You should probably listen to your friends that seem to understand the concept of crowd-sourced information better than you.
I haven't backpedaled at all, he's literally a grifter branding himself with other people's work. If he linked to the original source with all the other DD people could be reading on top of what he covers, I wouldn't have a problem with him. He passes it off as his own while branding himself. IDK how many times I have to say that.
"hE WilL pRoBaBlY sTaRt sElLiNg mErCh" fucking lol on that one. If he tries to sell anything, then yes hes a grifter. But (spoiler alert) he wont.