I will try and keep this complicated theory simple as there is a long story here. For more detail on why I am putting this together (See: https://x.com/edwinbarnesc/status/1758692402016199106?s=20)
Edwin Barnes previously outlined how Trump was secretly working with companies tied to BBBY and could be part of the MOASS.
I am building on this with his particularly interesting moves with DWAC & TMTG.
TMTG up until about 5 weeks ago was going to list on the Nasdaq as TMTG - But all of a sudden they decided to change their ticker to DJT.
For those who didnt know, DJT was previously the ticker for Donald Trumps Hotel & Casino that went bankrupt. To understand this fully you should watch this youtube video about fail to deliver: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0WXg5T3cBE
Failure to deliver is how market makers and corrupt wallstreet go after a company by creating synthetic shares, which they dont own. They flood the market with fake shares and when the company finally goes bankrupt they never have to reconcile the fake shares and get to keep all the profits they made by selling what they didnt own. You as a purchaser of those fake shares lose everything but the operators keep the money and up until DJT lists they have gotten away with it. The ticker DJT was one they probably never expected to come back alive.
So what happens when that ticker becomes active again? Yep, those brokers who participated in the generation of the fake shares are back on the hook as they never reconciled and covered their failure to deliver of the shares. The ledger is back and shows them owing on an asset that they havent delivered.
https://theintercept.com/2016/09/24/naked-shorts-cant-stay-naked-forever/
This may well be the start of the MOASS and may show all of these clowns on wallstreet who have participated in the flooding of fake synthetic shares that they are doomed in the long run. If tickers such as BBBY do the same BOOM they are so beyond blown up.
I’m a big fan of Edwin’s research, and how his going down the rabbit hole on the GME/BBBY situation has led him to DWAC and Trump, but I can’t see how a new entity using a ticker symbol that was previously used by a different entity makes them one in the same. If it’s the same CUSIP number, then yeah, but just the same ticker symbol is a stretch.
This anon is covering that exact piece here https://truthsocial.com/group/dwac/statuses/112151224895942242
I agree.