There's a reason our ancestors largely kept women out of positions of power. It wasn't because there weren't many capable women.
I think it's because they recognized that the damage wrought by the loons who slip through far exceeds the benefit of the limited pool of capable women. At some point, the men said "enough" in one society, banned women to the home, and their society flourished. Eventually every nearby group in the area saw the benefits of this arrangement (or got conquered due to their weakness) and did the same. This proven system lasted for centuries if not millenia until the Marxtards grabbed hold of Education in the 1960s.
You're so close... Women aren't the problem, the communists are. They (mostly men at first, still men in most industry) purposely drive to make education fail and destroy society, undermine art and culture, morality, etc. The resulting men and women of all races are set against their families, their nature, church and God, etc. So they are easily baited and twisted into little soldiers of hate. If you end up hating them blindly and assigning blame to them instead of the designers of the system that produced them, well, they beat you. Blaming tools for their handlers won't get us to the next level, it will leave the handlers in place making more tools.
God made men and women and a range of talents. If I see a good woman leader of business or something traditionally male, I'm behind her equally as if be behind a male. I've suffered under crap male bosses and crap female bosses, they tend to fail in different ways. But I've been under great ones, too. Their training and heritage made a lot of difference in their outcomes. Your argument would lose us the Kari Lakes and Michael Robinsons of the current political world because you're be looking first at everything except their talents and actions.
There's a reason our ancestors largely kept women out of positions of power. It wasn't because there weren't many capable women.
I think it's because they recognized that the damage wrought by the loons who slip through far exceeds the benefit of the limited pool of capable women. At some point, the men said "enough" in one society, banned women to the home, and their society flourished. Eventually every nearby group in the area saw the benefits of this arrangement (or got conquered due to their weakness) and did the same. This proven system lasted for centuries if not millenia until the Marxtards grabbed hold of Education in the 1960s.
You're so close... Women aren't the problem, the communists are. They (mostly men at first, still men in most industry) purposely drive to make education fail and destroy society, undermine art and culture, morality, etc. The resulting men and women of all races are set against their families, their nature, church and God, etc. So they are easily baited and twisted into little soldiers of hate. If you end up hating them blindly and assigning blame to them instead of the designers of the system that produced them, well, they beat you. Blaming tools for their handlers won't get us to the next level, it will leave the handlers in place making more tools.
God made men and women and a range of talents. If I see a good woman leader of business or something traditionally male, I'm behind her equally as if be behind a male. I've suffered under crap male bosses and crap female bosses, they tend to fail in different ways. But I've been under great ones, too. Their training and heritage made a lot of difference in their outcomes. Your argument would lose us the Kari Lakes and Michael Robinsons of the current political world because you're be looking first at everything except their talents and actions.