The requirements for a bridge are set by people farther up the expertise chain than we are. Should an airport be able to handle a direct hit by a crashing 747? Should every highway lampost be able to handle a direct hit by a semi-trailer? There comes a point where the trade study incorporates the cost of preventive measures instead of the cost of building a miniature fortress that would experience damage anyway. I expect more will come out about the criteria used for the bridge design.
Saw an interview where some engineer said that the bridge was built 50 years ago with standards used back then- no bridge from back then could withstand a direct hit from a modern container ship. You gotta remember those ships are mammothly huge these days....
Serious question. Shouldn’t the bridge support be able to handle a direct hit?
The requirements for a bridge are set by people farther up the expertise chain than we are. Should an airport be able to handle a direct hit by a crashing 747? Should every highway lampost be able to handle a direct hit by a semi-trailer? There comes a point where the trade study incorporates the cost of preventive measures instead of the cost of building a miniature fortress that would experience damage anyway. I expect more will come out about the criteria used for the bridge design.
Saw an interview where some engineer said that the bridge was built 50 years ago with standards used back then- no bridge from back then could withstand a direct hit from a modern container ship. You gotta remember those ships are mammothly huge these days....
Bigly.