I don't think that is a very good review. Lerner exposes how the BB is propped up by major fudge factors. For example they only found 5% of the matter predicted to exist in a gravity-dominated universe so they made up dark matter which cannot be detected but adds the 95% missing matter! So the reviewer's claim that "Instead of proposing a testable hypothesis and objectively observing whether experimental data support the hypothesis, TBBNH promotes a belief system in the guise of a scientific theory and sets out to prove the doctrine" is actually backwards. Lerner shows how establishment astronomy does exactly that.
I don't think that is a very good review. Lerner exposes how the BB is propped up by major fudge factors. For example they only found 5% of the matter predicted to exist in a gravity-dominated universe so they made up dark matter which cannot be detected but adds the 95% missing matter! So the reviewer's claim that "Instead of proposing a testable hypothesis and objectively observing whether experimental data support the hypothesis, TBBNH promotes a belief system in the guise of a scientific theory and sets out to prove the doctrine" is actually backwards. Lerner shows how establishment astronomy does exactly that.