I'm calling it now. My expectation and conviction is that within the next few months, Donald Trump will announce Michael Flynn as his VP candidate.
Now I know that traditionally, the VP position is a bit of a lame duck, and, I can understand the argument that Flynn would be much better in a position in the administration where he can help take the Cabal Deep State apart, but....
-
I am confident at this point that the White Hats have even much more control of the game board than they did in 2017 or even 2021.
-
The requirements for taking down the Swamp structure have been planned and put in place for quite some time.
-
That the VP position CAN be critical and effectively wielded, as both a counsel to POTUS and as a free agent to run all sorts of operations.
-
The real KEY issue at this point in the game is what happens when DJT completes his 4 years as POTUS.
So while Flynn would be very powerful in a variety of roles, being backstop (should anything happen to DJT over the next 5 years) and being in position to step up to the position of POTUS following DJT - these things are critical.
Moreover, I also believe that DJT was in training to become POTUS for MANY years, decades operating as a white hat to take down certain parts of the criminal network in the US (i.e. Mafia). Which to me implies that the POTUS following DJT (very often the VP) has also been planned out for a LONG time.
Of course, there are always contingencies in good planning, but something as important as the followup to Trump is not something that would be decided haphazardly or even late in the game. If the Trump rise was planned for years before 2016, then also what follows Trump would also have been heavily gamed out.
The next Potus will need to be just as strong, just as ruthless (against the Deep State) and a man of steel, someone with the gravitas and skill knowledge set to continue the fight against the Cabal remnants AND also withstand anything they bring up.
Trump was/is a wartime president. I think Flynn would be the right man for the job. And a general as a President has a long set of precedents.
Other factors that have influenced my thought direction in this include:
Things DJT has said: "Michael Flynn, are you ready to serve again?" & "The VP is not important to the election; but it has to be someone you can rely on" etc.
Flynn's work over the past 4-6 years, working on the grassroots level and more recently amping up his public presence (films, books, etc).
But another big factor is my internal sense of things, formulated over years of engaging with the Great Awakening and beyond. That's a subjective feeling, but that's why I feel like I have to back it.
Lot's of other small things, such as Flynn's connections with anons and so forth.
So who knows? None of us actually knows, but I'm calling it now, after considering this for quite some time. I guess we'll see whether I'm right or not in the coming months.
I don't think I have any ego attachment to this belief; it's a belief and not something I know for a fact. But nonetheless, I'm willing at this point to be vocal about that belief.
Whatever the outcome, may God bless and protect the team that is chosen to take the banner forward.
Let’s get back to having noble generals/military as president instead of ignominious lawyers.