My take on the Precipice is that we will reach it when the horror of child abuse and harvesting is shoved in the world's face. That's when the Cabal will attempt to pull the plug. That's when X and Space Force will really come into play. All else going on is peripheral to that fact. Cont.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (95)
sorted by:
Difference 1 between espionage organisation and Wikileans:
Espionage organizations have assets that they cultivate and place them in specific places based on what intel they want to gather.
Wikileaks, however allowed any person anywhere to share information they believe is damning and not addressed through right channels, without prior cultivation.
Difference 2:
Espionage organizations collect data and keep it to themselves, to be used to further their own goals.
Wikileaks released collected data after making sure it was whetted. The end result was exposing crimes by the government and allowing the beginnings of Great Awakening.
Difference 3:
Espionage ultimately harms the target
Wikileaks ultimately helped the target (Not just American people in this case, but also the World)
By no stretch of imagination and no amount of warping the brain can one truly believe that Assange & Wikileaks are an espionage organization.
Ordinary folks from both left and right want him pardoned. Infact, he is most powerful unifying person I have seen so far.
Trump did not pardon him because he was blackmailed by the RINOs (Impeachment)
Indictments are one side of the narratives. You cannot come to a judgement solely based on indictments.
We are not discussing Snowden and I am not sure your characterization that he is "guilty of treason" is correct, but regardless its not relevant to this discussion
Snowden stole from the NSA and Assange took information from the DOD. Systems information taken from these agencies put National Security at risk.
Nothing that Assange took put any national security at risk. The opposite, it exposed vast amounts of corruption and exposed PizzaGate.
They use the label "national security" to hide their crimes and anyone who exposes it is accused of espionage and treason. If you had been awake the past few years, this would not even be an argument.
Then why is he indicted? You need to do research.
He is indicted because the Deep State did not like what he was exposing.
Fren, you need to listen less to false prophets and use your own thinking a bit more. Reading an indictment is just one part of the "research". Its one way of framing the events.
Every event can be framed in many ways. You actions causes someone to die. "You murdered him", "You committed homicide", "You were defending himself". These are all valid ways of framing that action. Indictment will just provide one way of framing it. To understand the full story, you need to understand all aspects of the action - when, where, how, what motive, who gained, etc.
I would encourage you to approach this from a different angle.
If there are some extreme crimes being committed within the government and everyone is covering it up, and standard whistleblowing methods are also covered by the same criminals, and these crimes are designated as "national security", how will the people know about these crimes?
This is the ONLY question that really matters with Julian Assange case. If you think that any way of exposing those crimes are "espionage" or "treason" because it violates their rules, they put in place to protect themselves - then there is no hope of freedom for the people.
If you are happy with it, then you are probably in the wrong place. We, as people, are not okay with it. We want those cimes to be exposed AND those loopholes forever destroyed.
That is what Assange's case is really about.