Something is impossible if it can't happen. If there are no happenings, there can be no mathematics. It is an empty challenge. Plenty of coincidences happen for the first (and only) time.
The comparison with the Model T automobile is risible. The top speed of the 1908 model was 42 mph, and the estimated running speed of the tyrannosaurus was anywhere from 10 to 45 mph. Of course, it helps to fictitiously claim exactitude in order to argue for precise coincidence.
Meanwhile, folks in Utah at the Dinosaur National Monument are still digging dinosaur bones out of 150-million-year-old mountain rock.
the estimated running speed of the tyrannosaurus was anywhere from 10 to 45 mph
It is always important to look at initial reporting at the time. And the initial reporting at the time, stated the estimate speed of the T-Rex as 45 mph. Of course, that's a ludicrous number. And future reports estimate far more reasonable figures.
But understand, in 1908, that original number. That 45 mph they seemingly pulled out of thin air, had a purpose behind it.
And I see plenty of sources stating the Model T's top speed as 45 mph.
Determination of "top speed" is notoriously uncertain, because you are operating somewhere near the engine's (and vehicle's) limit of integrity. My point is that there is no precision involved in this, and you admit that the number for the tyrannosaurus was pulled out of the air at the time. If you can't stand up to a claim being taken seriously, you shouldn't make the claim.
Understand that "the medium is the message" for the purpose of Symbolic Communication.
Comms-Aware Clowns, in 1908 reading the Newspapers, got the heads up regarding the Model T's future dominance by reading bogus stories regarding the T-Rex.
there is no precision involved in this, and you admit that the number for the tyrannosaurus was pulled out of the air at the time
What matters is what those Editors in those Newspapers chose to put to print. That is what contains the Comms. There need not be any basis in reality for what they are using. The majority of CERN discoveries are simply vehicles for relaying Comms. The discovery is simply an excuse, or rather, a lexicon in their vocabulary, to communicate about topics that really matter.
You are dreaming. For you, it is all about "comms." You are only extracting symbology out of a Rorschach blot. The majority of CERN discoveries are obscure attempts to publicize their work for the sake of continuing their funding. No more "symbology" than a circus sideshow---and it sucks you in completely, to be convinced that they are "communicating about topics that really matter."
A symbol, by the way, is not a communication. It is, at best, a word. Communication requires sentences and is for the purpose of reducing uncertainty about (1) WHETHER there is a message, and (2) WHAT the message is.
Something is impossible if it can't happen. If there are no happenings, there can be no mathematics. It is an empty challenge. Plenty of coincidences happen for the first (and only) time.
The comparison with the Model T automobile is risible. The top speed of the 1908 model was 42 mph, and the estimated running speed of the tyrannosaurus was anywhere from 10 to 45 mph. Of course, it helps to fictitiously claim exactitude in order to argue for precise coincidence.
Meanwhile, folks in Utah at the Dinosaur National Monument are still digging dinosaur bones out of 150-million-year-old mountain rock.
And Wyoming !
It is always important to look at initial reporting at the time. And the initial reporting at the time, stated the estimate speed of the T-Rex as 45 mph. Of course, that's a ludicrous number. And future reports estimate far more reasonable figures.
But understand, in 1908, that original number. That 45 mph they seemingly pulled out of thin air, had a purpose behind it.
And I see plenty of sources stating the Model T's top speed as 45 mph.
Determination of "top speed" is notoriously uncertain, because you are operating somewhere near the engine's (and vehicle's) limit of integrity. My point is that there is no precision involved in this, and you admit that the number for the tyrannosaurus was pulled out of the air at the time. If you can't stand up to a claim being taken seriously, you shouldn't make the claim.
Understand that "the medium is the message" for the purpose of Symbolic Communication.
Comms-Aware Clowns, in 1908 reading the Newspapers, got the heads up regarding the Model T's future dominance by reading bogus stories regarding the T-Rex.
What matters is what those Editors in those Newspapers chose to put to print. That is what contains the Comms. There need not be any basis in reality for what they are using. The majority of CERN discoveries are simply vehicles for relaying Comms. The discovery is simply an excuse, or rather, a lexicon in their vocabulary, to communicate about topics that really matter.
You are dreaming. For you, it is all about "comms." You are only extracting symbology out of a Rorschach blot. The majority of CERN discoveries are obscure attempts to publicize their work for the sake of continuing their funding. No more "symbology" than a circus sideshow---and it sucks you in completely, to be convinced that they are "communicating about topics that really matter."
A symbol, by the way, is not a communication. It is, at best, a word. Communication requires sentences and is for the purpose of reducing uncertainty about (1) WHETHER there is a message, and (2) WHAT the message is.