Because I’ve followed since day 1 and I don’t remember the specific wording used in the post?
Again, it’s not my job to find it so you can take it as you will.
I know what Q said on the topic and this is very reassuring for me personally, just you and I talking here so nothing left for me to prove or show to anyone. I know it to be true, you can start at post 1 and really find it if you want to know it to be true as well.
My memory is sharp in remembering exactly how I felt about the posts and the reassurance given. It wasn’t cryptic or up for interpretation it was pretty plain and simple.
But the way Q searches work I would need to find a specific word or phrase that doesn’t bring up a thousand other posts to sift through. Feel free to take up the task yourself if you missed it the past 6 years 5K posts later. 🤷🏻♂️
If you make the claim it is certainly not anyone else's responsibility to back it up. I think it is a misinterpretation if not an outright confabulation.
You could have said that in the beginning instead of going off in the weeds on the unrelated stuff. I know about the who has been talking to you post but thanks for the reminder. I can see how you took it to mean there would be an acknowledgment by Q team members. Not sure if it is that exactly but that's ok.
Because I’ve followed since day 1 and I don’t remember the specific wording used in the post?
Again, it’s not my job to find it so you can take it as you will.
I know what Q said on the topic and this is very reassuring for me personally, just you and I talking here so nothing left for me to prove or show to anyone. I know it to be true, you can start at post 1 and really find it if you want to know it to be true as well.
My memory is sharp in remembering exactly how I felt about the posts and the reassurance given. It wasn’t cryptic or up for interpretation it was pretty plain and simple.
But the way Q searches work I would need to find a specific word or phrase that doesn’t bring up a thousand other posts to sift through. Feel free to take up the task yourself if you missed it the past 6 years 5K posts later. 🤷🏻♂️
u/#q60
If you ask me this post is saying the operator is the only one who has information and won’t divulge of the “full picture” not their iden.
I’ve also responded to this with previous post about “when you find out who has been talking”
If you make the claim it is certainly not anyone else's responsibility to back it up. I think it is a misinterpretation if not an outright confabulation.
Well this isn’t even the one I’m thinking of, but to counter your screenshot.
“Wait until you learn WHO HAS BEEN talking to you here.”
This classic well known post, alone, implied we should wait till WE LEARN “WHO” has been TALKING to us HERE (as in the board)
Cheqm8 fren
The rest is up to you
You could have said that in the beginning instead of going off in the weeds on the unrelated stuff. I know about the who has been talking to you post but thanks for the reminder. I can see how you took it to mean there would be an acknowledgment by Q team members. Not sure if it is that exactly but that's ok.
No I said it’s not the post I’m thinking of, I’m still firm the two I described exist. However this post is not very cryptic or any word play.
Assuming there’s no disinfo, in what other way could you interpret “wait till anons find out who has been talking here