This is not a proof in my mind. I'll refer back to the recently stickied write-up on what is a proof. Here is what we are working with.
A Q drop from May 4, 2018, numbered 1311, where he claims a new Trip Code (password used for generating a hash) for 8chan with 'Trip Update'.
TS Post by DJT on Mar 29 with a video entitled "Biden Trip Counter"
DJT replying that post today, 4/5 at 12:11 with an updated video (biden falls a lot, kek) UPDATED: “BIDEN TRIP COUNTER”
So the proof here is that because DJT posted at 12:11, that somehow translates to 13:11 (which is doesn't). The 13:11 timestamp is from a site I don't recognize that I think aggregates DJT's TS posts?
Someone could argue time zones, but then all of this becomes very meaningless to draw connections off of, because both 8chan and TS localize time to your TZ. So in this instance, I believe the initial 'proof' of looking at the timestamp and then correlating that to a Q drop, only works if you view one site in one timezone, and the other site in a timezone -1.
Secondly, I would expect if this were automated as some folks suggest, the time would be 12:11:00 not 12:11:35
Just my thoughts on why these things never really seem all that bulletproof to me.
It is posted at 13:11 which is the correct timezone, Q always uses DC local time which recently went into daylight saving as they switch between EST and EDT. Every Q proof ever has used DC local. The only exception i can think of is the Iran missile strike killing the Iranian General Soleimani. Every news article reports his death on 1/3/20 which correlates to Q post 1320 "Today, EVIL lost control / leverage of Iran." As it happened at 1 am in Iran, it was technically still 1/2/20 in America, but that wouldn't be an effective Q proof, so Q used the Iranian date as the event happened there and all the news would use that date.
This is not a proof in my mind. I'll refer back to the recently stickied write-up on what is a proof. Here is what we are working with.
So the proof here is that because DJT posted at 12:11, that somehow translates to 13:11 (which is doesn't). The 13:11 timestamp is from a site I don't recognize that I think aggregates DJT's TS posts?
Someone could argue time zones, but then all of this becomes very meaningless to draw connections off of, because both 8chan and TS localize time to your TZ. So in this instance, I believe the initial 'proof' of looking at the timestamp and then correlating that to a Q drop, only works if you view one site in one timezone, and the other site in a timezone -1.
Secondly, I would expect if this were automated as some folks suggest, the time would be 12:11:00 not 12:11:35
Just my thoughts on why these things never really seem all that bulletproof to me.
It is posted at 13:11 which is the correct timezone, Q always uses DC local time which recently went into daylight saving as they switch between EST and EDT. Every Q proof ever has used DC local. The only exception i can think of is the Iran missile strike killing the Iranian General Soleimani. Every news article reports his death on 1/3/20 which correlates to Q post 1320 "Today, EVIL lost control / leverage of Iran." As it happened at 1 am in Iran, it was technically still 1/2/20 in America, but that wouldn't be an effective Q proof, so Q used the Iranian date as the event happened there and all the news would use that date.