Interesting Q proof!
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
This is not a proof in my mind. I'll refer back to the recently stickied write-up on what is a proof. Here is what we are working with.
So the proof here is that because DJT posted at 12:11, that somehow translates to 13:11 (which is doesn't). The 13:11 timestamp is from a site I don't recognize that I think aggregates DJT's TS posts?
Someone could argue time zones, but then all of this becomes very meaningless to draw connections off of, because both 8chan and TS localize time to your TZ. So in this instance, I believe the initial 'proof' of looking at the timestamp and then correlating that to a Q drop, only works if you view one site in one timezone, and the other site in a timezone -1.
Secondly, I would expect if this were automated as some folks suggest, the time would be 12:11:00 not 12:11:35
Just my thoughts on why these things never really seem all that bulletproof to me.
I think the Scotsman is correct here. Not sure where DJT was at the time of posting, but the DC or Florida time zone for this would be 13:11.
That said, I don't know that I would classify this sort of thing as a Q proof. Rather, I would label it as a Possible Qction, or maybe Q happening.
It's a pretty interesting correlation, using the word Trip. In this case, an easy play on words. Also, the video stopping at 17 trips, which is a pretty strong Q-ism (aka #17). Then, DJT posting "Updated:" at the head of the post, correlating to "Update" in the original Q post.
This sort of correlation is muich stronger than the Chongqing connections. Firstly, it does NOT require foreknowledge of event 6 years in to the future (A rather wild premise to start with), and secondly, it does not require Q or White Hats or anyone to have caused the event (which in the case of the earthquake is just a wild, aka very stretchy idea as well).
The idea here is not that somehow Q or WHs are causing Biden to trip. Rather, if a bonafide Qction, it only requires that DJT or his team (staff who are posting) be aware of the Q operation, specific core concepts and terms, and then to post in a way that establishes some sort of connection, such as the time stamp.
Purpose: A nod and a wink to anons who are watching, but certainly not a proof in itself, imo.
Far more feasible than the chongqing connection, which was outlandish and uber-stretchy in my opinion. This one is a lot better, because its easier, doesn't require outlandish assertions or assumptions, and make sense logically.
I'm not a big fan of these sorts of "proofs", but in terms of plausibility this one leaves that other one far behind. But not a proof. We don't need proofs now. Already far too many 'proofs' out there. DJT's team playing WWG1WGA at the conclusion of a number of rallies is already a big wink and nod to anons and a proof to some extent.
Either way, I think you've done well to apply some critical thinking and skepticism, and that's the real point.
It is posted at 13:11 which is the correct timezone, Q always uses DC local time which recently went into daylight saving as they switch between EST and EDT. Every Q proof ever has used DC local. The only exception i can think of is the Iran missile strike killing the Iranian General Soleimani. Every news article reports his death on 1/3/20 which correlates to Q post 1320 "Today, EVIL lost control / leverage of Iran." As it happened at 1 am in Iran, it was technically still 1/2/20 in America, but that wouldn't be an effective Q proof, so Q used the Iranian date as the event happened there and all the news would use that date.