Dr Makis lists 4 "Experimental Protocols" for using IVERMECTIN with CANCER
The "Dr.Makis Ivermectin Cancer Protocols"
NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN and CANCER Part 2 - Treating Turbo Cancer - 7 new studies released in 2024 show Ivermectin works against CANCER - suggested PROTOCOLS for COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Induced Turbo Cancers
Last year, in October, I wrote one of the most popular articles on Ivermectin (IVM) and Cancer Treatment ever published, which went viral Internationally, with millions of views.
After the article, I was flooded with 1000s of questions, not about mechanisms of IVM action against cancer, but about protocols, doses, formulations - which Ivermectin to use and how to use it, what are the doses, for how long, etc.
This article is the practical approach that addresses all of those questions.
There are 3 types of Ivermectin formulations on the market:
pills or tablets in 3mg, 6mg or 12mg
liquid form, usually 1mL per 10mg of IVM
paste form, usually 6.4g per 120mg of IVM
(always check the dosages when not using pill form)
I propose 4 "Experimental Protocols" for using IVERMECTIN with CANCER (especially in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated Individuals who have developed TURBO CANCER):
The "Dr.Makis Ivermectin Cancer Protocols"
LOW DOSE (<=0.5mg/kg)
Cancers in remission
Strong family history
genetic predisposition
prophylactic use
MEDIUM DOSE (1.0mg/kg)
Starting dose for most Cancers, including mRNA Vaccine Induced Turbo Cancers (lymphoma, breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, melanoma, testicular/cervical/ovarian, kidney, etc)
HIGH DOSE (2.0mg/kg)
Starting dose for aggressive Turbo Cancers, especially Leukemias, pancreatic, brain cancer
aggressiveness of a tumor is often determined on pathology (Ki67 staining of 80%+ for example)
some very aggressive rare types (appendix, gallbladder, cholangiocarcinoma, angiosarcoma & other sarcomas)
VERY HIGH DOSE (2.5mg/kg)
Very desperate situations
have only days to live
extreme tumor metastases burden
extremely poor prognosis
certain aggressive or very large brain tumors?
Let's run a thought experiment:
A 30 year old teacher (60kg) took 4 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines and has just been diagnosed with Stage 4 Turbo Colon Cancer with a few liver metastases (very common scenario after Pfizer or Moderna).
This person considers a MEDIUM DOSE 1mg/kg/day IVERMECTIN regimen (in addition to standard chemo/rad) which is 60mg of IVM a day
That would be five 12mg pills a day
OR 6 mL of IVM liquid (10mg/1mL) a day
The liquid version is much cheaper and could be as cheap as $1 per day. The cost of pills varies widely and could be anywhere from $10 to $50 a day, depending on where you import them from.
Let's run another thought experiment:
A 25 year old who took 3 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines and has a strong family history of cancer, is very worried about developing Turbo Cancer.
This person wants to take a low dose Ivermectin regimen as prophylaxis. She takes 12mg a day.
She understands that currently there are no human trials looking at Ivermectin as prophylaxis against developing cancer.
Let's run another thought experiment:
A 45 year old Canadian doctor has taken 8 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines, has been diagnosed with a baseball sized Grade 4 brain tumor (glioblastoma) and has been given weeks to live. He decides to take 2.5mg/kg/day and develops some visual symptoms that go away after a few days. The tumor starts to shrink in size over the course of several weeks and his Canadian doctor colleagues are baffled.
For brain cancers in particular, the issue is getting sufficient IVM across the blood brain barrier to have an impact on brain tumors. So a higher dose is necessary.
I tried to read his sub stack article that he references, but there is a pay wall. I want to believe and spread the information about Ivermectin/cancer, but I’m not comfortable sending a link out that requires $
Me too, have someone I know who is fighting cancer (most likely from vaxxes), not sure if him or his wife will read it, but his wife has been opening up to new treatments lately, and seeing that she was wrong about ivermectin before, maybe she would be open to reading it. Chance that you could lose your loved one to cancer can open up the eyes and minds of some people. But doubt anyone will pay to read it especially if they are on the fence or just plain can't afford to, and to me, if a person wants to put the information out there to help others, then stop with the paywalls. I understand they want to make a little something for them putting in the work, but this is to help heal people from cancer.
This is not medical advice but rather anecdotal - a close relative of mine diagnosed with colon cancer and after a few years of chemo - surgery - chemo - remission - cancer again - back on chemo - finally agreed to try something else. I suggested they try fenbendazole + ivermectin (222 mg/day and 24 mg/day, respectively, four days a week), and within 6 weeks their PET scans were “clear” and their cancer antigen test results were back to normal (~2 ng/mL). This protocol was based on Joe Tippens’ experiences and after reading a few research papers on ivermectin vs. cancer. This relative has been in remission again for over a year now.
A friend of a friend, suffering from liver cancer for the past three years, and on chemo since the diagnosis with no change in status, agreed to try the same therapy (fenbendazole + ivermectin), and four weeks after starting the new protocol, their next PET scan was also clear and he’s been that way now for several months.
Lastly, my personal story. I’ve had this weird looking mole on my back since my teen years. I’ve had it scraped and tested a number of times over the years and although declared “non-cancerous”, it’s always eventually grown back to its irregular nickel-sized shape. About a year ago, though, its outer surface really started to roughen up and I was getting resigned to the fact that I’d need another scraping and have it sent to the lab. And then a couple of months ago… on this board I ran across a post discussing fenbendazole and/or ivermectin and a few comments on skin cancer that suggested a dermal application of either fenbendazole (liquid) or ivermectin (horse paste) as a possible therapy. Well, since I had both products on hand I decided to give it a try (prior to this I’d been taking fenbendazole + ivermectin off and on for several months prior as a prophylactic). It’s been about four weeks since I started and that mole has reduced in size by about 70%, with about 80% of that reduction occurring in the first two weeks. I’ve also applied the same treatment to a few other moles and with those, there has been no change in their shape or size.
From my evolving understanding of cancer, I’ve come to a conclusion (not exclusive) that chemo combined with fenbendazole + ivermectin can be a very effective treatment approach. Time-tested chemo does work, but in a lot of cases, it might only kill 80-90% of the cancer with the remainder becoming resistant to it. I think that’s where the fenbendazole + ivermectin comes in to eradicate the rest of the cancer. I also think that fenbendazole + ivermectin can be used solely against the cancer, but it might take higher dosages of the two to become fully effective.
Like I said - anecdotal, and hopefully you might find some of this helpful. Good luck!
Great information. How do you know which horse paste & Fenbendazole is safe for human consumption. I know the l these drugs are safe for humans but it's the additives that might not be safe.
Dr Makis lists 4 "Experimental Protocols" for using IVERMECTIN with CANCER The "Dr.Makis Ivermectin Cancer Protocols"
NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN and CANCER Part 2 - Treating Turbo Cancer - 7 new studies released in 2024 show Ivermectin works against CANCER - suggested PROTOCOLS for COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Induced Turbo Cancers
Last year, in October, I wrote one of the most popular articles on Ivermectin (IVM) and Cancer Treatment ever published, which went viral Internationally, with millions of views.
After the article, I was flooded with 1000s of questions, not about mechanisms of IVM action against cancer, but about protocols, doses, formulations - which Ivermectin to use and how to use it, what are the doses, for how long, etc.
This article is the practical approach that addresses all of those questions.
There are 3 types of Ivermectin formulations on the market:
(always check the dosages when not using pill form)
I propose 4 "Experimental Protocols" for using IVERMECTIN with CANCER (especially in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated Individuals who have developed TURBO CANCER):
The "Dr.Makis Ivermectin Cancer Protocols"
LOW DOSE (<=0.5mg/kg)
MEDIUM DOSE (1.0mg/kg)
HIGH DOSE (2.0mg/kg)
VERY HIGH DOSE (2.5mg/kg)
Let's run a thought experiment: A 30 year old teacher (60kg) took 4 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines and has just been diagnosed with Stage 4 Turbo Colon Cancer with a few liver metastases (very common scenario after Pfizer or Moderna).
This person considers a MEDIUM DOSE 1mg/kg/day IVERMECTIN regimen (in addition to standard chemo/rad) which is 60mg of IVM a day
That would be five 12mg pills a day OR 6 mL of IVM liquid (10mg/1mL) a day
The liquid version is much cheaper and could be as cheap as $1 per day. The cost of pills varies widely and could be anywhere from $10 to $50 a day, depending on where you import them from.
Let's run another thought experiment: A 25 year old who took 3 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines and has a strong family history of cancer, is very worried about developing Turbo Cancer.
This person wants to take a low dose Ivermectin regimen as prophylaxis. She takes 12mg a day. She understands that currently there are no human trials looking at Ivermectin as prophylaxis against developing cancer.
Let's run another thought experiment: A 45 year old Canadian doctor has taken 8 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines, has been diagnosed with a baseball sized Grade 4 brain tumor (glioblastoma) and has been given weeks to live. He decides to take 2.5mg/kg/day and develops some visual symptoms that go away after a few days. The tumor starts to shrink in size over the course of several weeks and his Canadian doctor colleagues are baffled.
For brain cancers in particular, the issue is getting sufficient IVM across the blood brain barrier to have an impact on brain tumors. So a higher dose is necessary.
I tried to read his sub stack article that he references, but there is a pay wall. I want to believe and spread the information about Ivermectin/cancer, but I’m not comfortable sending a link out that requires $
Me too, have someone I know who is fighting cancer (most likely from vaxxes), not sure if him or his wife will read it, but his wife has been opening up to new treatments lately, and seeing that she was wrong about ivermectin before, maybe she would be open to reading it. Chance that you could lose your loved one to cancer can open up the eyes and minds of some people. But doubt anyone will pay to read it especially if they are on the fence or just plain can't afford to, and to me, if a person wants to put the information out there to help others, then stop with the paywalls. I understand they want to make a little something for them putting in the work, but this is to help heal people from cancer.
This is not medical advice but rather anecdotal - a close relative of mine diagnosed with colon cancer and after a few years of chemo - surgery - chemo - remission - cancer again - back on chemo - finally agreed to try something else. I suggested they try fenbendazole + ivermectin (222 mg/day and 24 mg/day, respectively, four days a week), and within 6 weeks their PET scans were “clear” and their cancer antigen test results were back to normal (~2 ng/mL). This protocol was based on Joe Tippens’ experiences and after reading a few research papers on ivermectin vs. cancer. This relative has been in remission again for over a year now.
A friend of a friend, suffering from liver cancer for the past three years, and on chemo since the diagnosis with no change in status, agreed to try the same therapy (fenbendazole + ivermectin), and four weeks after starting the new protocol, their next PET scan was also clear and he’s been that way now for several months.
Lastly, my personal story. I’ve had this weird looking mole on my back since my teen years. I’ve had it scraped and tested a number of times over the years and although declared “non-cancerous”, it’s always eventually grown back to its irregular nickel-sized shape. About a year ago, though, its outer surface really started to roughen up and I was getting resigned to the fact that I’d need another scraping and have it sent to the lab. And then a couple of months ago… on this board I ran across a post discussing fenbendazole and/or ivermectin and a few comments on skin cancer that suggested a dermal application of either fenbendazole (liquid) or ivermectin (horse paste) as a possible therapy. Well, since I had both products on hand I decided to give it a try (prior to this I’d been taking fenbendazole + ivermectin off and on for several months prior as a prophylactic). It’s been about four weeks since I started and that mole has reduced in size by about 70%, with about 80% of that reduction occurring in the first two weeks. I’ve also applied the same treatment to a few other moles and with those, there has been no change in their shape or size.
From my evolving understanding of cancer, I’ve come to a conclusion (not exclusive) that chemo combined with fenbendazole + ivermectin can be a very effective treatment approach. Time-tested chemo does work, but in a lot of cases, it might only kill 80-90% of the cancer with the remainder becoming resistant to it. I think that’s where the fenbendazole + ivermectin comes in to eradicate the rest of the cancer. I also think that fenbendazole + ivermectin can be used solely against the cancer, but it might take higher dosages of the two to become fully effective.
Like I said - anecdotal, and hopefully you might find some of this helpful. Good luck!
Great information. How do you know which horse paste & Fenbendazole is safe for human consumption. I know the l these drugs are safe for humans but it's the additives that might not be safe.