Can't wait to hear oral arguments, and SCOTUS questions on this.
Firstly, the president does not have immunity from prosecution for committing illegal acts. That is what Impeachment is for. Impeached in the House. Tried in the Senate. Exactly the way our constitutions directs.
Secondly, SCOTUS ask, "Are you saying that if we rule against the immunity clause that troops should be obeying unlawful orders contrary to the Military Code of Justice requirement, which by obeying could land them in jail.
Warn? Sounds like a good reason for SCOTUS to dismiss the case.
Can't wait to hear oral arguments, and SCOTUS questions on this.
Firstly, the president does not have immunity from prosecution for committing illegal acts. That is what Impeachment is for. Impeached in the House. Tried in the Senate. Exactly the way our constitutions directs.
Secondly, SCOTUS ask, "Are you saying that if we rule against the immunity clause that troops should be obeying unlawful orders contrary to the Military Code of Justice requirement, which by obeying could land them in jail.