Great, if they're publishers they can be held financially liable for anything they publish, right? We should only grant protections to common carriers that must carry all speech and the moment you try and censor, curate, or promote you should be open to libel claims.
Okay then apple and google cannot restrict apps based on the same? Scotus ruled in that, no EPIC vs APPL? Or can they as part of their freedom of operation principles in play also make the same claim? And Twitter, with the myriad of censorship requests from globalist nations around the globe? Its quite the paradox... Highlights hypocrisy at its finest.. stop noticing things.
Great, if they're publishers they can be held financially liable for anything they publish, right? We should only grant protections to common carriers that must carry all speech and the moment you try and censor, curate, or promote you should be open to libel claims.
The MSM says nothing but criminal lies and lying while hiding behind the 1st Amendment Must be made a crime because it is so obvious.
Okay then apple and google cannot restrict apps based on the same? Scotus ruled in that, no EPIC vs APPL? Or can they as part of their freedom of operation principles in play also make the same claim? And Twitter, with the myriad of censorship requests from globalist nations around the globe? Its quite the paradox... Highlights hypocrisy at its finest.. stop noticing things.
Companies are not people. They have no 1st Amendment rights.
One of the first issues the SC needs to make clear is a reverse of the liberal SC's rulings that made corporations equal in rights to people.
If one company is a subsidiary of another company, isnt that slavery?
Frens we're at peak level ig'nant