"The Living God already has a plan to cut the head from the snake (illegal false government) and Redeem His fallen people.
Perhaps He will use the liberation of America as a type to show what He plans to do later with Israel?
The Bible is the tip of an iceberg. It is a primer to teach the basics to a hungry soul and ignite direct two-way ongoing guidance between Creator and Child. When you mock what you see as “just a book”, in the presence of those who have been awakened to God and regularly experience Him respond and guide… well no offense intended, but you’re like children who don’t believe a parent telling them the stove is hot, because it doesn’t look hot.
We understand your inability to understand, but we have not been given power to make you understand. We still love you, and look forward to the day when you will understand.
But in the meantime… you think you understand Israel, but you really don’t. Direct your ire at the tiny sect that moved their own people to kill their Redeemer and now runs our global media, not at the People that Redeemer has sworn He will free from their captors.
Satan thought he won when Christ was lifted upon the cross. He also thought he won and ensured Israel’s permanent corruption when the Rothschilds brought the nation back into being… you call Trump a 4d genius, but think God doesn’t know the plans of His enemies and use them to bring His own plans to fruition?
Satan is a real being, and his greatest defeats have come by his own hand… in the moments when he thought he was achieving his greatest victories. If you think Jesus isn’t going to have the last word on “Israel”… I’ve got a bridge in Baltimore to sell you."
(Pepe Deluxe)
The jewish state in Palestine today, calling itself "Israel," and filled with Israeli jews, has NOTHING to do with the biblical Israel -- either the place (kingdom) or its people (the Israelites).
In the Book of Acts, chapter 26, Paul was defending himself:
Clearly, Paul was not himself a jew. He was being accused by the jews. Who was Paul? He wrote all the epistles (letters) to his fellow Israelites in Europe. Time after time, he wrote about "we" and "our" and "us" when addressing the Israelite people.
Jews were never Israelites. So, who were/are they?
"Mine own nation" means the Isrealites. The English word "nation" (in modern Bible translations) comes from "nacio," which has to do with birth, or genetic lineage. It is not a country, as we know of that concept, but rather a blood brotherhood of the same race of people. He and his "nation" knew the jews while living in Jerusalem, which was a racially "diverse" society in those times, like many countries are today.
The Pharisees were also racially diverse, and they lived their religious life under the Tradition of the Elders, which was the precursor to the Talmud. But the Tradition of the Elders was a FALSE religion (as it is today), and Paul would leave that ideology to a become a Christian.
The Hebrews (who were not jews) followed the Old Testament. But the jews came in with their Tradition of the Elders, which was a perversion of the OT. The Pharisees bought into this perversion, not realizing it was actually in opposition to the OT. Then, Christ came, and Christianity was born. So, Paul was talking from a perspective that most people today do not understand.
Here, he is saying that he had been in agreement with the jews and their false view of the Old Testament, laying the foundation that he was not attacking the jews, because he had once believed the things they did.
The jews were attacking him for no longer agreeing with them, and instead following Christ.
"Our twelve tribes" -- again -- references Paul's own genetic heritage of being an Israelite, and NOT a jew.
"I am accoused of the Jews," which is obviously a DIFFERENT people than the twelve tribes of Israel.
1,500 years later, Martin Luther would write, in his book "The Jews and Their Lies" (1543):
Christians need to stop sucking jewish dick (they do enough of that themselves), and stop supporting the jewish state in Palestine, which is and has always been a den of vipers and nothing but lies.
^^THIS^^
from Galatians 6:
11Ye see how large a letter I have written unto you with mine own hand. 12As many as desire to make a fair shew in the flesh, they constrain you to be circumcised; only lest they should suffer persecution for the cross of Christ. 13For neither they themselves who are circumcised keep the law; but desire to have you circumcised, that they may glory in your flesh. 14But God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom the world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world. 15For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.
16And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God.
Seems like there's an Israel NOT of God, and a different one, which Paul calls the Israel of God. Hmm. Wonder who the other one belongs to...
It means the people of God.
The Israelite people (not jews).
In Galatians, Paul was writing to the Israelite people whose ancestors had lived in the Kingdom of Israel, then taken captive by the Assyrians, and later moved north.
Galatia was the area that is today known as western Turkey.
The people living there during Paul's time were decended from the original Israelites.
They had already started drifting away from their heritage and not living under The Law or following Christ.
He was writing the epistle (letter) to them, to remind them how they were supposed to live their lives.
Galatians 1:1-4 --
"Bretheren" because Paul was also an Israelite. They were genetic brothers, related by blood.
"Our sins," "might deliver us, "our Father."
Galatians 5:1 --
Who had been in bondage? These Israelite people who were now living in Galatia, or their parents, grandparents, and other immediate ancestors.
In Galatians 6, Paul is talking about the practice of circumcision to his brothers. In the Old Testament, God wanted His men to be circumcised, probably to distinguish them from other people who were not His people.
But since those old days, the jews (not God's people) had adopted the practice of circumcision, too, and used that as a basis to claim they were of God's people.
Here, Paul is saying that Jesus/God no longer cares about circumcision, because it is no longer a distinguishing characteristic of His people. The jews had "culturally approprated" the practice, so to speak, so it had lost its meaning.
The passages you cited:
Circumcision was no longer a requirement of God's people, and instead following Christ is what God expected of His people ("a new creature," meaning a change in understanding The Law, since times had changed; that is why God came to Earth in human form, calling himself Jesus).
God now wants His people to walk in the way that Jesus taught, and if they do, then mercy shall be upon the people of God.
No, you are just not interpreting it in the proper context.
Modern churches do not teach the truth of the Bible, in many important aspects.
Romans 9 also has some bits which seem to apply here:
6Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed. 9For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son. 10And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac; 11(For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;) 12It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. 13As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.
This Israel is fake.