She either lied about channeling the Archangel Michael, or she mistook the demon that she channeled for same.
There are no other options.
And personally, I don't like to just outright deny metaphysical claims, so I'd lean towards her channeling a demon over making it up. And at that point, to listen to her may as well be to listen to a demon.
If Q is connected to someone channeling demons (it isn't), that isn't a good thing.
Not all patterns are relevant. Not all patterns matter. Not all patterns are real.
We can find patterns anywhere, but coincidences ARE real, and sometimes the patterns we draw are just figments of our imagination, or massive straw-grasps. It's simply the way the brain works.
All that matters is God and what He tells us, and God is quite clear on matters of channeling.
And as an aside, listening to all sides is an extremely bad practice, in my opinion. It's all good and fine to think that I could listen to Satan himself and not be deceived since I know who he is, but is that true? To so confidently say yes would suggest to me a god complex and that one views oneself as perfect in their judgement. I am not the arbiter of truth, God is (and in my view, so many who think they worship God really just worship their own intellect).
Really, demons should be ignored, as we know they will never tell us anything worth hearing. Anything they say will only serve evil. Listening to evil and incorporating it into our thinking will never lead to good. All it serves to do is warp and corrupt our minds.
Finally, I'd love to hear a cogent argument as to how my dichotomy is flawed. It's easy to dismiss people as "having their minds made up"; it's hard to actually present a case in favor of, or against, a concrete position. Maybe you have your mind "made up", but mine is fresh and ready for anything you can throw at it.
She either lied about channeling the Archangel Michael, or she mistook the demon that she channeled for same.
There are no other options.
And personally, I don't like to just outright deny metaphysical claims, so I'd lean towards her channeling a demon over making it up. And at that point, to listen to her may as well be to listen to a demon.
yeah I hear this a lot, people have their minds made up about her. and that's fine, no use me trying to persuade.
i'm just compelled to listen to all sides; especially when there are many Q connections with General Flynn, SS K-17, the location of the prayer etc.
If Q is connected to someone channeling demons (it isn't), that isn't a good thing.
Not all patterns are relevant. Not all patterns matter. Not all patterns are real.
We can find patterns anywhere, but coincidences ARE real, and sometimes the patterns we draw are just figments of our imagination, or massive straw-grasps. It's simply the way the brain works.
All that matters is God and what He tells us, and God is quite clear on matters of channeling.
And as an aside, listening to all sides is an extremely bad practice, in my opinion. It's all good and fine to think that I could listen to Satan himself and not be deceived since I know who he is, but is that true? To so confidently say yes would suggest to me a god complex and that one views oneself as perfect in their judgement. I am not the arbiter of truth, God is (and in my view, so many who think they worship God really just worship their own intellect).
Really, demons should be ignored, as we know they will never tell us anything worth hearing. Anything they say will only serve evil. Listening to evil and incorporating it into our thinking will never lead to good. All it serves to do is warp and corrupt our minds.
Finally, I'd love to hear a cogent argument as to how my dichotomy is flawed. It's easy to dismiss people as "having their minds made up"; it's hard to actually present a case in favor of, or against, a concrete position. Maybe you have your mind "made up", but mine is fresh and ready for anything you can throw at it.