If Cats wants to ban me for being critical of their methods, then they're free to do so. It would only serve to prove my point.
Any mod of this site has a job, and that is to serve these boards. While certain topics may be deemed against the rules and thus be removed, having an opinion in the comment section should not EVER be grounds for removal.
Cats has repeatedly stepped outside their bounds as mod, and is the only mod I've seen do this.
It is my opinion that Cats, due to repeated aggression and hostile stances against frens due to their opinions, should be relieved of their duties as mod.
I got banned for a day for reporting posts that had nothing to do with the great awakening. For instances, my dog is getting treatment, my sister had a baby, etc. the mods banned me for excessively reporting.
I had been unfairly perma-banned for commenting my opinion on the use of direct energy weapons under a thread pertaining to said usage.
I wasn't banned for posting a thread, but merely commenting my opinion under that thread. I had no prior violations or mod actions against me previous to this comment.
Cats was just personally offended and used their power as mod to ban and gatekeep.
Cats, you need to take a step back and evaluate your reason for being here. Is it to espouse what it means to be a fren and be committed to the common goal, or is it to stroke your ego and be a massive douchebox to the people here, thus dissuading their participation?
I suspect it's time the mods come together and reevaluate your position.
I would argue that we're at a point where we have evolved to encompass more than just the Q posts and discussion surrounding; That we have grown to seeking all truth that those sleeping have been unaware of.
Q was our origin and what brought us together in pursuit of truth. Now we must be free to dig, to discuss, to find.
For instance, the dog getting treatment should be allowed to remain because Fenbendazole, like Ivermectin, has been theorized and is said to be useful in dogs and humans against cancer. That post is an experiment to test said theory. As an informational and direct experience, it should remain.
The sister having a baby is likely a prayer request, which should always be allowed. If we don't like it, we can downvote it and move on.
It shouldn't be up to the mods to determine what is viable information and what is drivel.
It should be up to us, collectively, as a group. In this regard, had many more of us agreed with you and also reported a post to the point of action, THEN it should fall under mod review.
A single rogue mod should not have the power to ban posts or comments or frens.
Again, Cats has gone beyond these parameters and I disagree strongly with this.
Must disagree. This is not a religious page, any prayer request should be put under general chat. The dog was put in general chat after I reported it, then I got a one day ban for it. One mod agreed with me, while another mod banned me. Fenben experimentally in a human could be reported, but in a dog, no. Many meds for animals do not cross over to humans. The other way is more viable, as ivermectin was created for humans, but found to kill bacteria/ parasites in horses.
Yikes, here comes your one day ban in 3….2….1….lol
If Cats wants to ban me for being critical of their methods, then they're free to do so. It would only serve to prove my point.
Any mod of this site has a job, and that is to serve these boards. While certain topics may be deemed against the rules and thus be removed, having an opinion in the comment section should not EVER be grounds for removal.
Cats has repeatedly stepped outside their bounds as mod, and is the only mod I've seen do this.
It is my opinion that Cats, due to repeated aggression and hostile stances against frens due to their opinions, should be relieved of their duties as mod.
I got banned for a day for reporting posts that had nothing to do with the great awakening. For instances, my dog is getting treatment, my sister had a baby, etc. the mods banned me for excessively reporting.
I had been unfairly perma-banned for commenting my opinion on the use of direct energy weapons under a thread pertaining to said usage.
I wasn't banned for posting a thread, but merely commenting my opinion under that thread. I had no prior violations or mod actions against me previous to this comment.
Cats was just personally offended and used their power as mod to ban and gatekeep.
u/catsfive can confirm this is what happened.
Cats, you need to take a step back and evaluate your reason for being here. Is it to espouse what it means to be a fren and be committed to the common goal, or is it to stroke your ego and be a massive douchebox to the people here, thus dissuading their participation?
I suspect it's time the mods come together and reevaluate your position.
I would argue that we're at a point where we have evolved to encompass more than just the Q posts and discussion surrounding; That we have grown to seeking all truth that those sleeping have been unaware of.
Q was our origin and what brought us together in pursuit of truth. Now we must be free to dig, to discuss, to find.
For instance, the dog getting treatment should be allowed to remain because Fenbendazole, like Ivermectin, has been theorized and is said to be useful in dogs and humans against cancer. That post is an experiment to test said theory. As an informational and direct experience, it should remain.
The sister having a baby is likely a prayer request, which should always be allowed. If we don't like it, we can downvote it and move on.
It shouldn't be up to the mods to determine what is viable information and what is drivel.
It should be up to us, collectively, as a group. In this regard, had many more of us agreed with you and also reported a post to the point of action, THEN it should fall under mod review.
A single rogue mod should not have the power to ban posts or comments or frens.
Again, Cats has gone beyond these parameters and I disagree strongly with this.
Must disagree. This is not a religious page, any prayer request should be put under general chat. The dog was put in general chat after I reported it, then I got a one day ban for it. One mod agreed with me, while another mod banned me. Fenben experimentally in a human could be reported, but in a dog, no. Many meds for animals do not cross over to humans. The other way is more viable, as ivermectin was created for humans, but found to kill bacteria/ parasites in horses.