Why would they have been posting about it before the FSK bridge incident?
The reason people are posting about it now is because the FSK bridge incident was an extremely bad event that got people's attention, because people like to watch disasters.
What redundancies would be applied to the incident that happened here? There were unoccupied barges that got carried away by flood waters.
Just curious, what exactly are you basing your opinion on about these incidents happening more often? Have you done any actual digging into this, looking for all occurrences of bridge/Waterway incidents across the last X number of years and worked out the math into if it's happening more often or not?
Or are you basing your opinion on just what you're feeling is happening, largely influenced by social media algorithms that show you more stories about subjects that you've shown an interest in?
It’s not a feeling, suddenly more barges are hitting bridges and fires being set under bridges. People would have been reporting weird incidents before FSK if they were happening. Suddenly many are happening right after FSK. You’ll see more yet in the coming days.
If you’re referring to the redundancies, I’m talking about the ship that hit the FSK bridge. There are multiple fail safes to keep something like this from happening and yet it steered directly into the concrete pylon. Supposedly there wasn’t even a crew on that ship and it was steered remotely into the bridge. It’s almost assuredly an attack on our infrastructure from the deep state. You’ll see more things like this as more of their world is being exposed to the public and they need to divert and distract from themselves as much as possible. They don’t care about the American public and they’ll burn down Rome to take us all down if they can.
No, I was asking what redundancies the barges in the story here had.
If you think that the barges in this story were deliberately released to cause harm, what redundancies did they have to prevent damage?
You will see in the days ahead that the cabal will start to go crazy with more events like the FSK bridge which was definitely a planned event. There are multiple redundancies on those ships to prevent such things from happening.
You weren't just talking about the barge involved in the FSK incident. You seem to be using the FSK incident to claim that all the other incidents you've read about since have redundancies as well. If that wasn't your intention, there's no reason to bring up the FSK incident to point to this incident being deliberate. Because it has nothing to do with it. You're trying to use guilt by association here.
So how does that apply to this story? How did the cabal orchestrate heavy rains in the area and the flooding that caused the fast currents in the river that broke these barges loose?
I stand by what I said. If you look at events similar to this one prior to the FSK incident, you'll find that they've been happening all along.
It's only because the FSK event was a huge catastrophe, which caught the attention of the public, because people like to rubberneck at accidents. Now anything that happens concerning boats or bridges or waterways gets shared more because of that. I guarantee in two months, no one here will be talking about barges anymore, unless something new comes up about the FSK incident. It sure doesn't mean there aren't anymore incidents concerning boats/barges/bridges/waterways. But people will have tired of it and moved on to something else to talk about.
It will certainly put to test your theory that all these incidents are in the news because the cabal is making it happen. So just check back in with me in a couple months to see who is right. Or I can put it on my calendar to remind you.
Why would they have been posting about it before the FSK bridge incident?
The reason people are posting about it now is because the FSK bridge incident was an extremely bad event that got people's attention, because people like to watch disasters.
What redundancies would be applied to the incident that happened here? There were unoccupied barges that got carried away by flood waters.
Just curious, what exactly are you basing your opinion on about these incidents happening more often? Have you done any actual digging into this, looking for all occurrences of bridge/Waterway incidents across the last X number of years and worked out the math into if it's happening more often or not?
Or are you basing your opinion on just what you're feeling is happening, largely influenced by social media algorithms that show you more stories about subjects that you've shown an interest in?
It’s not a feeling, suddenly more barges are hitting bridges and fires being set under bridges. People would have been reporting weird incidents before FSK if they were happening. Suddenly many are happening right after FSK. You’ll see more yet in the coming days.
You're just repeating what you said in the last post and ignoring the points I made and questions I asked.
If you’re referring to the redundancies, I’m talking about the ship that hit the FSK bridge. There are multiple fail safes to keep something like this from happening and yet it steered directly into the concrete pylon. Supposedly there wasn’t even a crew on that ship and it was steered remotely into the bridge. It’s almost assuredly an attack on our infrastructure from the deep state. You’ll see more things like this as more of their world is being exposed to the public and they need to divert and distract from themselves as much as possible. They don’t care about the American public and they’ll burn down Rome to take us all down if they can.
No, I was asking what redundancies the barges in the story here had.
If you think that the barges in this story were deliberately released to cause harm, what redundancies did they have to prevent damage?
You weren't just talking about the barge involved in the FSK incident. You seem to be using the FSK incident to claim that all the other incidents you've read about since have redundancies as well. If that wasn't your intention, there's no reason to bring up the FSK incident to point to this incident being deliberate. Because it has nothing to do with it. You're trying to use guilt by association here.
So how does that apply to this story? How did the cabal orchestrate heavy rains in the area and the flooding that caused the fast currents in the river that broke these barges loose?
I stand by what I said. If you look at events similar to this one prior to the FSK incident, you'll find that they've been happening all along.
It's only because the FSK event was a huge catastrophe, which caught the attention of the public, because people like to rubberneck at accidents. Now anything that happens concerning boats or bridges or waterways gets shared more because of that. I guarantee in two months, no one here will be talking about barges anymore, unless something new comes up about the FSK incident. It sure doesn't mean there aren't anymore incidents concerning boats/barges/bridges/waterways. But people will have tired of it and moved on to something else to talk about.
It will certainly put to test your theory that all these incidents are in the news because the cabal is making it happen. So just check back in with me in a couple months to see who is right. Or I can put it on my calendar to remind you.