For whatever reason this is one of the conspiracies I haven't done much independent research on. Thoughts appreciated. Mainly, how are the commercial airlines complicit if this is a real thing? How does something like this not have a whistleblower? I am seeing people like Attkinson and Naomi Wolf post about this on Twitter so I am leaning towards maybe its a thing.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (63)
sorted by:
All you are saying is that you suspect the government of crimes. And so do I. But I have no right to suspect them of imaginary crimes, and all this talk of "chemtrails" is imaginary, by people who don't even understand contrails. Or what it would actually take to do something that would have a significant effect. Imagine: all this spraying...and no results?
No. It starts with a profound ignorance of the phenomenon, and I don't back down from that because it is my area of expertise. Persistent contrails are still only contrails, and you have nothing else to go on except prejudicial suspicion.
Not true death ray.
You can’t even get past a simple and basic scientific observation because you think you know but just look like a chode.
One very real effect of spraying these chemtrails is evident in California wild fires. What happens when you combine sabotage through poor forestry stewardship, drought manipulation, intentionally draining reservoirs and then spraying dry trees with aluminum particles?
Here you go mr science, here’s one effect of spraying that is extremely evident and very real.
https://firefighterinsider.com/aluminum-flammable/
“Will Aluminum Dust Explode/Spontaneously Combust?
However, it’s important to recognize that, as with many substances, aluminum dust does not behave in the same way as solid aluminum does.
When you make a material into a powder or dust, you dramatically increase the available surface area in comparison to the volume of material.
This has the effect of dramatically reducing the ignition point of the material and in the case of aluminum it means that aluminum dust can explode in the presence of a naked flame or an electrical spark.
Take a look:
It’s important to work very carefully with dust on any description and a full health and safety assessment should be done on the work environment and the individual working before any work is carried out.
There is quite a bit of evidence that says aluminum dust can spontaneously combust, though it would need to reach a fairly substantial concentration in the air to do so.
It is also worth noting that if the air contains any moisture, aluminum dust can react with the water, using the oxygen in the water to oxidize and freeing up hydrogen gas.
This is a major safety concern as hydrogen is highly flammable and can also spontaneously combust and will catch light very easily, indeed, in the presence of a naked flame or electrical spark.”
This is a bore. I am a rocket scientist and have known all about the use of powdered aluminum in solid rocket fuel. Experimental use of aluminum liquid slurries was carried out in the 60s, leading to higher energy release than its carrier liquid. For similar reasons, boron was explored as a "zip fuel" for the pending B-70 bomber, but had to be abandoned because of inconvenient combustion products.
Aluminum oxide is essentially incombustible, and that is the only natural form of aluminum. Aluminum dust from a machining environment (freshly-created, unoxidized surfaces) is a slightly different creature. It all depends on exactly what you have. Raw (unprotected) aluminum will in fact exothermically react with water.
All this is true, but you have proven nothing. Trace quantities of aluminum oxide will not catch fire. Raw aluminum can be melted by an open flame without catching fire (we used to do that to cast metal in my junior high school metalshop). No evidence of aluminum in the various wildfires. Nor of any aerial spraying.
So mr rocket scientist. They tell you that in the name of geo engineering they’re spraying you with aluminum in order to reduce the global temp and your calling them liars and saying that it’s just water is this correct?
Who is "they"? I'm not aware that anyone is telling me anything. Cloud-seeding has been known since the 1950s. Vain ideas like infiltrating clouds with reflective particles have been around for some time. I've also seen elaborate plans for space colonies. They haven't happened either.
Your "if it could be, it must be" mental approach is akin to reading a murder mystery and then declaring that the author "told us" how he was preparing to kill someone.