For whatever reason this is one of the conspiracies I haven't done much independent research on. Thoughts appreciated. Mainly, how are the commercial airlines complicit if this is a real thing? How does something like this not have a whistleblower? I am seeing people like Attkinson and Naomi Wolf post about this on Twitter so I am leaning towards maybe its a thing.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (63)
sorted by:
This is a bore. I am a rocket scientist and have known all about the use of powdered aluminum in solid rocket fuel. Experimental use of aluminum liquid slurries was carried out in the 60s, leading to higher energy release than its carrier liquid. For similar reasons, boron was explored as a "zip fuel" for the pending B-70 bomber, but had to be abandoned because of inconvenient combustion products.
Aluminum oxide is essentially incombustible, and that is the only natural form of aluminum. Aluminum dust from a machining environment (freshly-created, unoxidized surfaces) is a slightly different creature. It all depends on exactly what you have. Raw (unprotected) aluminum will in fact exothermically react with water.
All this is true, but you have proven nothing. Trace quantities of aluminum oxide will not catch fire. Raw aluminum can be melted by an open flame without catching fire (we used to do that to cast metal in my junior high school metalshop). No evidence of aluminum in the various wildfires. Nor of any aerial spraying.
So mr rocket scientist. They tell you that in the name of geo engineering they’re spraying you with aluminum in order to reduce the global temp and your calling them liars and saying that it’s just water is this correct?
Who is "they"? I'm not aware that anyone is telling me anything. Cloud-seeding has been known since the 1950s. Vain ideas like infiltrating clouds with reflective particles have been around for some time. I've also seen elaborate plans for space colonies. They haven't happened either.
Your "if it could be, it must be" mental approach is akin to reading a murder mystery and then declaring that the author "told us" how he was preparing to kill someone.
No mr rocket scientist, your just speculating about me and what I know based your own ignorance and naive understanding of this topic.
If you merely searched the key words such as “stratospheric aerosol injections”, the evidence presents itself, such as who the generic reference of who “they” implies.
Here are examples of real factual situations where the government sprayed its own people without they’re knowledge or consent and did harm in the process. It also provides evidence of planes ring outfitted to spray chemicals and biological weapons.
Take note of how the military used private corporations that work along side them.
https://www.wondersandmarvels.com/2014/06/experimenting-innocent-u-s-armys-secret-chemical-testing-1950s-1960s.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK233494/
“During the 1950s and 1960s, Stanford University and the Ralph Parsons Company (both contractors for the U.S. Army Chemical Corps) conducted atmospheric-dispersion tests with ZnCdS particles in Minneapolis, MN; Corpus Christi, TX; St. Louis, MO; Fort Wayne, IN; and 29 other urban and rural locations in the United States and Canada. The tests were purportedly used to develop and verify meteorologic models for estimating the dispersion of aerosols in various environments. However, the real purpose was to obtain information that would be useful for estimating the potential dispersion of BW agents and determining munitions requirements for the strategic use of BW agents against selected cities of the former Soviet Union. The tests were designed to provide information on the dispersion of BW agents over a short distance (for example, within a city, such as Minneapolis), over many miles (Fort Wayne, IN), and over several thousand square miles (Large Area Coverage test).
Operation LAC, which took its name from "Large Area Coverage," was the largest test ever undertaken by the Chemical Corps. The test area covered the United States from the Rockies to the Atlantic, and from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico. The tests proved the feasibility of covering large areas (thousands of square miles) of a country with BW agents. Many scientists and officers had believed this possible, but LAC provided the first proof.
I have no doubt this happened, or similar events, but past actions do not prove the occurrence of present actions. Earlier parts of the overall program involved ground-based emission sites. Project LAC involved C-119 airborne carriers, which had a maximum altitude capability of only 29,000 feet, and would certainly not be operating at maximum altitude if the objective was mass ground distribution. (The had another career as forest fire water bombers, where the altitudes were substantially lower.) The experiments did cover distances as far as 1200 miles from the drop point, but were the result of air masses moving into/across the drop zone carrying the particles away. (The particles were chosen because they were fluorescent and could be optically tracked.) "Thousands of square miles" of coverage is a lot, but the continental United States has a total area of 3.1 million square miles. It would be an uphill struggle to cover the entire population in the teeth of prevailing weather.
The military always use private companies to provide goods and services. These operations were not kept secret; they were simply unadvertised, and later came under criticism. I have no doubt they were prohibited. So, am I clear that such prohibitions are to be dismissed as nonexistent---or are they as potent as the new (toothless) Tennessee law?
Interesting that you had to pull a 67-year-old rabbit out of a hat for your "aha" moment. All it proves is the possibility to pull off a limited operation with special aircraft operating lower than typical for commercial flights. No indication that any of these sprays were even visible, and I would expect them not to be if they were below contrail altitude. Still no evidence for "chemtrails."