The Iran missile attack were ineffective and intentionally so. Iran leaders simple had to save face. If you remember they did the same thing after POTUS took out Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in 2019. They fired off a bunch of missiles that didn't hit anything but sand. They even informed the US military that they weren't going to hit any bases.
The Iran missile attack were ineffective and intentionally so. Iran leaders simple had to save face. If you remember they did the same thing after POTUS took out Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in 2019. They fired off a bunch of missiles that didn't hit anything but sand. They even informed the US military that they weren't going to hit any bases.
I agree.
This was to save face and to avoid an escalation Israel and Iran don't want.
Do you mean Qasem Soleimani? al-Baghdadu was from ISIS, not Iran.
You're correct, my bad. It was Soleimani and although he was deleted in Baghdad outside the airport and Iran weakly retaliated with a few missiles.
The missiles were close enough that a lot of US service members suffered internal injuries. It wasn't cost free.
…and the US tax payers pay the bill for Iran’s depleted stock piles
Iran did a ping test. Results: Israeli air defense - even with US and UK support - can be hit anywhere even when they know it's coming.
North Korea and Russia got valuable data
Bingo!
Thank you for sharing this.