https://ianbrighthope.substack.com/p/mrna-is-a-class-one-carcinogen
(Found cross-posted by Dr. Jessica Rose, who introduces the link by saying "I literally said this yesterday").
This substack column is particularly important given that Big Pharma and Big Food are working feverishly to use mRNA in, apparently, everything.
For a quick summary in support of that (admittedly hyperbolic) assertion, I asked Leo, the Brave browser AI, "What products are mRNA being used in or considered to be used in?" and got the following reply:
mRNA technology is being explored for various products, including vaccines, cancer treatments, and gene therapies. Some companies are also investigating its use in agriculture and food production. However, it's important to note that most of these products are still in development and have not yet been approved for widespread use.
Ian's column includes detail about carcinogenicity and how various authorities define "carcinogenic" and provides some evidence (a very small amount compared to the totality of what is out there) that the mRNA "vaccines" are indeed carcinogenic. Below, the Conclusion:
CONCLUSION
Statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS- CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown.
Commentary by Dr. John Campbell: (embedded YouTube video of Dr. Campbell speaking on the subject follows)
Saying that two distinct "vaccines" deliver DNA material to the cell is way too simplistic and honestly only serves to confuse and overly concern readers. Honestly, it's irresponsible.
Yes the two vaccines deliver DNA to the cell. The difference is 'how?', 'what dna?' and 'how does the body react to that DNA material?'.
Vector vaccine: delivers a modified previously existing virus to the cell. The modified virus contains, in this case, pieces of COVID. The body then recognizes the DNA as foreign then instructs the cell to create antibodies. That is to say, the body writes it's own prescription against this foreign body via the transcription process then creates messenger RNA and disburses this recipe to the rest of the body so that the entire body is able to create the antibodies therefore recognize the foreign invader and defeat it.
Vector vaccines use the body's already existing and natural process to create mRNA.
mRNA vaccine: delivers bits of the corona virus to the cell using a different mechanism. Since the cell will recognize this mRNA as foreign because it was NOT made by the individuals body. As a result the mRNA vaccine has no chance to enter the cell on its own. As a result the makers of this vaccines cover the mRNA with a synthetic fat molecule. This synthetic molecule is a lipid nanoparticle. The cell does not recognize the particle that hides the mRNA within. Therefore allows this invader in without any checks. It simply does not question it. Once it's in the cell it releases the synthetic messenger RNA and instructs the body to create replicas of itself. That is to say it tricks the human biology to create the spike protein. Since the body created it the body does NOT recognize this protein as foreign therefore does NOT create antibodies INSTEAD trains the body to recognize it as benign therefore allows this spike protein to roam freely to damage as it sees fit. Why? Because, although harmful, since the body created it it begins to recognize it as NOT harmful because the body can't possibly create something harmful to itself. This mechanism is naturally occuring in the human body via the IgG4 function within our own immune system. This mechanism is the same tool the immune system uses in order to NOT react with inflammatory behavior towards other benign bodies like pollen and peanuts. That is how one may be affected by pollen early on in ones life but in their later life are unaffected by it. Because the body created a false identifier library for that foreign object and calls off the attack from your immune system so resources are not wasted on benign foreign bodies that do not cause damage to the human biology.
Since mRNA vaccines deliver THE instructions and bypass the body's naturally occuring process the body never has a chance to create a custom prescription for the disease.
More boosters yield more and an enhanced IgG4 reaction therefore hindering the body's ability to fight more with every booster. As a result we see the gravity of the disease and instances of death rise in synchronicity with booster uptake.
Again. Yes they deliver DNA to the cell. But the mechanism and body's reaction is very different. To say otherwise is irresponsible.
Do they both cause harm? Yes. But it appears, so far, the gravity of damage and amount of time that damage can occur is much different.
I did not say J&J was good in any way. I was simply bringing attention to the differences and possible outcomes.