And no, A1S8C1 is not where the definition of “income” is at
Correct, like I said: If you’re looking for a single source (which I think you are) you won’t find it. Instead you have to “connect the dots” so to speak.
Simply doing a word search is the epitome of laziness, as it requires the least amount of effort. Reading is where the reward is. “Income” is a form of taxation, so again, start with the articles I linked and go down the rabbit hole.
The only way to win is litigation and that requires understanding.
You are, then, referring to statutes and USC, which are not the Constitution, and calling it “the Constitution”.
Stop accusing of laziness when you’re using the wrong terms. I asked you if that was what you meant.
And no, A1S8C1 is not where the definition of “income” is at. Fairly sure it’s not in USC either.
Usc and statues are codifications of public law.
Correct, like I said: If you’re looking for a single source (which I think you are) you won’t find it. Instead you have to “connect the dots” so to speak.
Simply doing a word search is the epitome of laziness, as it requires the least amount of effort. Reading is where the reward is. “Income” is a form of taxation, so again, start with the articles I linked and go down the rabbit hole.
The only way to win is litigation and that requires understanding.
If you just want some copy paste nonsense, try https://www.freedomlawschool.org/ or https://capitalvsincome.com/
“Thanks.”