This aged well... Will this post last longer than it did on patriots.win..
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
So... If "unconstitutional" is your bar, how about all those red flag laws and gun control laws that they continue pushing through?
Even if they are legally challenged to success later, damage is still done.
If you are not from the u.s then I wouldn't expect you to understand what constitutional interpretation is.
I never said that was my bar either, straw man argument.
There are no anti Semitic laws in any state in the u.s.
Do your research, rules on college campuses do not count, which I assume is where you are getting this idea.
Constitutional "interpretation" is bullshit, and anyone advocating such is retarded and uneducated.
You don't even know what a straw man argument is, but like a common /r/politics leftist you try to bring it up where it doesn't fit.
Your childish projection of inadequacy and subsequent condescension to being challenged based on existing and current events is not only misplaced, it is just plain stupidity.
Saying something is "bullshit" is not an argument...
Also why I couldn't engage. Low IQ retort.
Everything I said makes sense, I never "advocated" I'm just pointing out what IS.
Just because you thinks it's BS doesn't mean we dont use it.
A straw man is you arguing something I never claimed. YOU CLAIMED I SAID THE CONSTITUTION IS MY ONLY BAR.
something I never said therefore it's a "straw man argument."
Are you really this stupid?
That is not what a strawman argument is.
A strawman argument is building up an argument and then attacking it whilst avoiding your argument. I directly addressed your argument.
You said that it is unconstitutional and therefore can't and doesn't happen and wouldn't pass Congress -- and you assert this in spite of unconstitutional laws doing exactly that, even if they end up struck down (and subsequently ignored by Biden admin).
The entire pretext is as stated in your post -- that it can't happen because it's unconstitutional -- and I attacked that and asserted that if your bar is that low that your argument has no foundation because they are already using it as toilet paper and performing unconstitutional acts.
Then you had the actual audacity to claim "Constitutional interpretation"? Get the fuck out of here with that. Those are the arguments they use to ban AR-15s and subvert the Constitution in even more overt ways, and it is bullshit.
The Constitution is not supposed to be "interpreted", it is to be obeyed as written.