To the un-awake mind... she sounds very convincing. But being awake, it is easy to see that most of what she says is an injection of her demeanor directly into Trumps mind... a place where she has no idea (nor evidence) is true. Total projection.
This is very effective when it is enforced by trolls, news media, hollywood, sports heroes, educators, etc. etc. Most people do not have the time (or take the time) to hear alternate views and real evidence. Honestly, it is a very impressive apparatus that has been constructed through multiple generations. But then there is this famous quote, "Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face!" It wakes you up very abruptly.
Even so, it will not work. Thank God for people like James Woods, Gen Flynn etc. The truth always wins in the end... of this, I am sure.
She’s full of inconsistencies. Right before she talks about the importance of weighing evidence, she waves around the bullshit indictments as if they’re evidence of anything more than the existence of Trump’s false accusers. It seems she’s talking to a lawyer named Mark who she butters up by saying that he proves his cases with evidence. She then wrongly applies that flattery to Joe Biden and contrasts Trump as if he’s a lawyer. Her mind is disorganized.
To the un-awake mind... she sounds very convincing. But being awake, it is easy to see that most of what she says is an injection of her demeanor directly into Trumps mind... a place where she has no idea (nor evidence) is true. Total projection.
This is very effective when it is enforced by trolls, news media, hollywood, sports heroes, educators, etc. etc. Most people do not have the time (or take the time) to hear alternate views and real evidence. Honestly, it is a very impressive apparatus that has been constructed through multiple generations. But then there is this famous quote, "Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face!" It wakes you up very abruptly.
Even so, it will not work. Thank God for people like James Woods, Gen Flynn etc. The truth always wins in the end... of this, I am sure.
She’s full of inconsistencies. Right before she talks about the importance of weighing evidence, she waves around the bullshit indictments as if they’re evidence of anything more than the existence of Trump’s false accusers. It seems she’s talking to a lawyer named Mark who she butters up by saying that he proves his cases with evidence. She then wrongly applies that flattery to Joe Biden and contrasts Trump as if he’s a lawyer. Her mind is disorganized.