Gossip filters its way down the chain of command. At least it did in 78. There were a lot of pissed off people in MI that didn’t want to see the change from Nixon to Ford to Carter.
And misinformation/disinformation also filters down.
I'm sure there were a lot of theories then, just as there are today.
And maybe hookers is the real reason.
But the facts are: (a) Woodward was Naval intelligence, (b) his source for info was a high-level FBI agent, (c) the Watergate Hotel break-in was conducted by CIA/FBI operatives, and (d) Nixon spoke of the "Bay of Pigs thing" as code for the JFK assassination points to the idea that this was much more important to those who wanted to truth hidden than some story about hookers and cocaine.
You don't take down a president because of hookers. JFK was banging Marilyn Monroe and others. Nobody really cared. And nobody would have believed Nixon himself was into hookers, anyway (LOL).
That story wreaks of disinfo.
I doubt your major knew anything about these other aspects of the story, and he probably believed the hooker stuff (which might have also been true, btw).
Your 3rd paragraph on Woodward is 💯 % correct. But your 4th paragraph misses the point. Yes, you don’t take down a president because of hookers. But when that president tries to destroy a political party by exposing their use of prostitutes, including children being trafficked, you destroy that president. Just look at what they are doing to Trump now. Look how they tried to discredit Q, blocked the release of Sound of Freedom, etc. No one wants to be connected to the oldest profession, especially when kids are involved. It’s true now and it was true in 72.
One final thing, I was there and you obviously weren’t.
There were many reasons the globalists wanted to take out Nixon going all the way back to him exposing Alger Hiss. Throw in wanting to end Vietnam with a victory, which included bombing the supply lines going through Cambodia, his numbers in the 72 election which indicated that he had the people behind him, and his economic policies, while imperfect (getting off the gold standard), still increased the quality of life at all economic levels.
Gossip filters its way down the chain of command. At least it did in 78. There were a lot of pissed off people in MI that didn’t want to see the change from Nixon to Ford to Carter.
True enough.
And misinformation/disinformation also filters down.
I'm sure there were a lot of theories then, just as there are today.
And maybe hookers is the real reason.
But the facts are: (a) Woodward was Naval intelligence, (b) his source for info was a high-level FBI agent, (c) the Watergate Hotel break-in was conducted by CIA/FBI operatives, and (d) Nixon spoke of the "Bay of Pigs thing" as code for the JFK assassination points to the idea that this was much more important to those who wanted to truth hidden than some story about hookers and cocaine.
You don't take down a president because of hookers. JFK was banging Marilyn Monroe and others. Nobody really cared. And nobody would have believed Nixon himself was into hookers, anyway (LOL).
That story wreaks of disinfo.
I doubt your major knew anything about these other aspects of the story, and he probably believed the hooker stuff (which might have also been true, btw).
Your 3rd paragraph on Woodward is 💯 % correct. But your 4th paragraph misses the point. Yes, you don’t take down a president because of hookers. But when that president tries to destroy a political party by exposing their use of prostitutes, including children being trafficked, you destroy that president. Just look at what they are doing to Trump now. Look how they tried to discredit Q, blocked the release of Sound of Freedom, etc. No one wants to be connected to the oldest profession, especially when kids are involved. It’s true now and it was true in 72.
One final thing, I was there and you obviously weren’t.
I never questioned what you were told.
My only question is: Which story is more likely to be the ultimate reason that Nixon was taken down?
Revealing the truth about JFK would be #1, in my view.
There were many reasons the globalists wanted to take out Nixon going all the way back to him exposing Alger Hiss. Throw in wanting to end Vietnam with a victory, which included bombing the supply lines going through Cambodia, his numbers in the 72 election which indicated that he had the people behind him, and his economic policies, while imperfect (getting off the gold standard), still increased the quality of life at all economic levels.