I think Laura is just finding connections, but she does not have the bigger picture. For example she mentions that a lot of the older people in these bloodlines have died in the recent days, but she doesn't find that fact notable but we know why.
Also she seems to think that Jewish power is represented by the likes of the Rothschild, but doesn't realise that the secret societies she talks about are still Jewish creations. Jesuits, for instance was founded by a Sephardic Jews and was succeeded by another Jew.
I concur: the rabbit hole is so deep its probably not possible to see the whole picture. She sees it through one angle, some have a wider view: we often find information by chance - I think it all fits somehow.
I've started reading Susan Bradford's Royal Blood Lies; interesting background to the Khazars, Venetians, Mongols, Rome, the nobles and the Roths. Flicking through to the end she seems to think Q is a spyop, which many agree with. Not everyone sees the same picture, but their knowledge is still valuable. We all seek enlightenment and truth.
Also, another way to analyse this. If these bloodlines are so powerful, why do they all need to show their allegiance to secret societies connected to the Jews? Its because they are beholden to the Bankers for managing their wealth. The connection is the opposite - Black nobilities being controlled by the secret societies in the back controlled by the Khazarians, and controlling the world of optics by lower end puppets like the Rothschilds. The ones behind the secret societies in the back are the ones who Putin referred to as "People whose names you dont even know"
I wonder if Laura is right about Putin being controlled by the Romanovs. Can't see him being controlled but who knows. So much we don't know.
I think Laura is just finding connections, but she does not have the bigger picture. For example she mentions that a lot of the older people in these bloodlines have died in the recent days, but she doesn't find that fact notable but we know why.
Also she seems to think that Jewish power is represented by the likes of the Rothschild, but doesn't realise that the secret societies she talks about are still Jewish creations. Jesuits, for instance was founded by a Sephardic Jews and was succeeded by another Jew.
I concur: the rabbit hole is so deep its probably not possible to see the whole picture. She sees it through one angle, some have a wider view: we often find information by chance - I think it all fits somehow.
I've started reading Susan Bradford's Royal Blood Lies; interesting background to the Khazars, Venetians, Mongols, Rome, the nobles and the Roths. Flicking through to the end she seems to think Q is a spyop, which many agree with. Not everyone sees the same picture, but their knowledge is still valuable. We all seek enlightenment and truth.
Also, another way to analyse this. If these bloodlines are so powerful, why do they all need to show their allegiance to secret societies connected to the Jews? Its because they are beholden to the Bankers for managing their wealth. The connection is the opposite - Black nobilities being controlled by the secret societies in the back controlled by the Khazarians, and controlling the world of optics by lower end puppets like the Rothschilds. The ones behind the secret societies in the back are the ones who Putin referred to as "People whose names you dont even know"
Indeed - its a very deep rabbit holes that goes back a long, long way. Wonder if we'll ever get to the bottom of it.