The hypotheticals that were being presented during arguments were not very hypothetical at all. Mostly all of these things happened in our countrys history recently. It seems as if we do not want immunity and even through they seem to be fighting for it that the stage is being set for other prosecutions. Now it can still be argued that presidents need immunity for various reasons such as national security. What do yall think. Do we need immunity for the executive? Is the Q plan to have immunity off the table because it seems ambivalent