Justice Sotomayor: “If the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military...to assassinate him, is that within his official acts for which he can get immunity?” - The Great Awakening

Justice Sotomayor: “If the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military...to assassinate him, is that within his official acts for which he can get immunity?” (twitter.com)

posted 241 days ago by UnvaxxedUnafraid 241 days ago by UnvaxxedUnafraid +198 / -0

67 comments

67 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (67)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– AmateurExpert 4 points 241 days ago +4 / -0

Here memorize these dates that are important only because they’ll be on the test.

What’s the principle?

What strategies were involved in this?

What did this lead to?

What was this battle’s role in the larger war?

Which side(s) could the people involved have been playing for?

What war? Who was fighting? Why?

CUI BONO?

Look kid (which is a baby goat - Matthew 25:32), just memorize the dates for the standardized test.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– Furecrotch 3 points 241 days ago +3 / -0

Just fail me. I dropped out for a reason.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Inidaho 1 point 241 days ago +1 / -0

Name checks out.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– AmateurExpert 2 points 241 days ago +2 / -0

Hm. May not have been clear that I was mocking what “social studies” doesn’t teach that civics should.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q