NEW: Judge Cannon Unseals Unredacted Mar-a-Lago Search Warrant Affidavit
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
🔍 Notable
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Most of this it's not emerging.
It's well known that the GSA helps move presidents out of the White House.They moved like a ton of boxes from the White House to Florida.
So Julie Kelly is not discovering something new here
It was mentioned here in 2022.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/10/politics/trump-documents-shipping-gsa/index.html
Both Trump and Kash Patel talked about the GSA in 2022. There's a dispute about who packed the boxes GSA moved. There's emails saying the boxes were packed before GSA picked them up.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-boxes-were-already-packed-when-government-movers-arrived-bloomberg-2022-10
The boxes did not originate with GSA. They originated in the White House. The question is who actually packed them.
When you know that, these two points
seem misguided.
Because like when I said a ton of boxes
and all originated at the WH not at GSA.
I'll talk willful retention tomorrow
Not according to this unsealed document.
In any lawsuit, its a battle between narratives. Both narratives are based on the facts and materials available to each side. Only when all facts start emerging, the narrative becomes clear.
All you are doing is simply regurgitate the enemy's narrative, which we dont need to come to GAW for - we can simply tune into the mainstream.
The whole point of GAW is to see beyond the enemy narrative, which a lot of Lawfag Anons miss, because they are so deeply programmed into the system. (I confess I used to be guilty of this where Big Tech was concerned because I made a career in the valley and it took me some time to get the 40K feet perspective for the area I am specialised in)
Just want to let you know that your efforts are essentially wasted here, because you are not helping the purpose of seeing through the narratives. You are simply pushing the enemy narratives with either the misguided or deliberate belief that "facts" always have a single interpretation regardless of context and it is the interpretation of the mainstream.
Just don't be surprised if you find yourself unwelcome here.