It's drop 60: https://qalerts.app/?n=60
You can count the people who have the full picture on two hands. Of those (less than 10 people) only three are non-military. Why is this relevant? Game theory. Outside of a potential operator who has been dialed-in w/ orders (specific to his/her mission) nobody else has this information. Operators never divulge. Alice & Wonderland.
Specifically this line:
Outside of a potential operator who has been dialed-in w/ orders (specific to his/her mission) nobody else has this information.
I've never seen anyone focus in on that one. But it's ALWAYS stood out to me. One of the craziest things about all this is who would have been in on it from the beginning, right? This post, and that line, seem to be telling us that someone else is part of this, but...only potentially...
So even team Q wasn't sure? Who is this one, apparently special person? And how are they actually related to the plan? Who would have all the same information as the original Q people, but not really be part of them? And what is their mission? Where did they get their orders from? And why are they a "potential" operator?
That's not how I read that... I think Q is using the term "operator" in the generic sense. He's referring to any potential "special operators" who may be "dialed-in" on mission specific, need-to-know details. And he's saying the Spec-Ops guys are never going to divulge any secrets about their missions.
But... Your take would be fascinating as well.
THIS! I am sure the night raid of the building on down town LA was one of these dialed in operator ops.
Many helicopter land with troops hauling stuff out of a building. I thought it was 2 but it was many 5 or 6.
Go in collect data, bag some one, or destroy something. They would need to only know what their mission params are.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SZuSagDFGE
Compartmentalized Op Secs.
That’s so funny I just wrote a little post above about my feelings of operator plural or not and cited this very example.
It was hard to explain my interpretation and took a good second but it popped up quick as an example.
Surely there are many more examples of this if we really look at it, so many moving parts, and many many many of them revolving around US Military.
This presumably would be the operators that are not 1 of less than 10, but still were dialed into specific missions.
If that were the case they would have just said "outside of potential operators". They specifically said "a" singular operator and the post is about the people who have a birds eye view of the plan.
I'm not trying to be rude, but grammatically you take isn't correct, and, as we know, details are important.
General "special operators" wouldn't be in on the initial plan, nor would they "have the full scope", which is what that post says that potential operator has.
The language allows for any potential operator variable. I disagree that this line is exclusive to 1 special someone. Compartmentalization is a huge part of "the plan"
Yes...has to be this way.
Each Operator only knows their part.